Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382315›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2017

Supervised classification of etoposide-treated

Anna Leida Mölder, Johan Persson, Zahra El-Schich, Silvester Czanner, Anette Gjörloff-Wingren

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of holographic imaging cytometer holomonitor M4® motility applications.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Leida MölderManchester Metropolitan University , School of Computing, Mathematics and Digital Technology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Johan PerssonMalmö University , Department of Biomedical Science, Health and Society, Malmö, Sweden.
Zahra El-SchichMalmö University , Department of Biomedical Science, Health and Society, Malmö, Sweden.
Silvester CzannerManchester Metropolitan University , School of Computing, Mathematics and Digital Technology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Anette Gjörloff-WingrenMalmö University , Department of Biomedical Science, Health and Society, Malmö, Sweden.
Malmö University · SEManchester Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell studies using noninvasive imaging is a challenging, yet appealing way to study cellular characteristics over extended periods of time, for instance to follow cell interactions and the behavior of different cell types within the same sample. In some cases, e.g., transplantation culturing, real-time cellular monitoring, stem cell studies,

Indexed as

cell classificationdigital holographic microscopydigital image cytometrylow-concentration etoposidenoninvasive microscopysingle-cell studies

Identifiers

PMID28382315
PMCPMC5366068
OpenAlexW2597904240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.