Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28382143›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2017

Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio: A Novel Prognostic Index of Overall Survival in Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy-treated Patients with Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Man Nie, Peng Sun, Cui Chen, Xiwen Bi, Yu Wang, Hang Yang, Panpan Liu, Zhiming Li, Yi Xia, Wenqi Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic Value of Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio forInternational journal of general medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Man NieDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Peng SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Cui ChenDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiwen BiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yu WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Hang YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Panpan LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Zhiming LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yi XiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wenqi JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNKey Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CNState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio (AAPR) has been recently revealed as a prognostic index for hepatocellular carcinoma, whereas its role in metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of AAPR in patients with metastatic NPC. We retrospectively reviewed 209 metastatic NPC patients treated with cisplatin-based regimens. Survival data were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards regression methodology. The optimal cutoff level of AAPR for assessing overall survival (OS) was 0.447, which was determined by R software. An AAPR less than 0.447 was significantly associated with a higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (273 vs. 185 U/L, P = 0.004), a higher EBV DNA viral load (5.59×10

Indexed as

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratiocisplatin-based regimensmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Identifiers

PMID28382143
PMCPMC5381169
OpenAlexW2594484779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.