ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2017
An Approach for All in Pharmacy Informatics Education.
Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital literacy in undergraduate pharmacy education: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Nursing informatics in undergraduate nursing education in Australia before COVID-19: A scoping review.Collegian (Royal College of Nursing, Australia) · 2022Article
- PET imaging to assess fibroblast activation protein inhibitor biodistribution: A training program adapted to pharmacology education.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022Article
- Lebanese pharmacists' confidence and self-perceptions of computer literacy: scale validation and correlates.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2020Article
- Assessing pharmacy students' preferences with implementing electronic medical records into the pharmacy curriculum.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020Article
- Health Informatics Competencies for Pharmacists in Training.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- A Progress Report on the State of Pharmacy Informatics Education in US Pharmacy Schools and Colleges.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018Article
- Vital Directions for Pharmacy Education and Practice: Report of the 2017-18 Argus Commission.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018Article
- An Approach for Some in Advanced Pharmacy Informatics Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
- Pharmacy Informatics: Where Medication Use and Technology Meet.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computerization is transforming health care. All clinicians are users of health information technology (HIT). Understanding fundamental principles of informatics, the field focused on information needs and uses, is essential if HIT is going to support improved patient outcomes. Informatics education for clinicians is a national priority. Additionally, some informatics experts are needed to bring about innovations in HIT. A common approach to pharmacy informatics education has been slow to develop. Meanwhile, accreditation standards for informatics in pharmacy education continue to evolve. A gap remains in the implementation of informatics education for all pharmacy students and it is unclear what expert informatics training should cover. In this article, we propose the first of two complementary approaches to informatics education in pharmacy: to incorporate fundamental informatics education into pharmacy curricula for all students. The second approach, to train those students interested in becoming informatics experts to design, develop, implement, and evaluate HIT, will be presented in a subsequent issue of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.