Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28381622›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Genetic variation during range expansion: effects of habitat novelty and hybridization.

Amanda A Pierce, Rafael Gutierrez, Amber M Rice, Karin S Pfennig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Population Genetics ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genome ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda A PierceDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9507-0009
Rafael GutierrezDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Amber M RiceDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Karin S PfennigDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA kpfennig@unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-287X

Funding

SEEDING POSTDOCTORAL INNOVATORS IN RESEARCH &EDUCATIONK12GM000678 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DONALD T LYSLE, Kathryn Joanna Reissner · 1999 to 2026
$30.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM000678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How species' ranges evolve remains an enduring problem in ecology and evolutionary biology. Species' range limits are potentially set by the inability of peripheral populations to adapt to range-edge habitat. Indeed, peripheral populations are often assumed to have reduced genetic diversity and population sizes, which limit evolvability. However, support for this assumption is mixed, possibly because the genetic effects of range expansion depend on two factors: the extent that habitat into which expansion occurs is novel and sources of gene flow. Here, we used spadefoot toads,

Indexed as

EcosystemGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHybridization, GeneticAnimalsAnuraGene Flowadmixtureinterbreedingintrogressionlandscape geneticspopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID28381622
PMCPMC5394663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.