Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28381484›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Effect of silhouetting and inversion on view invariance in the monkey inferotemporal cortex.

N Apurva Ratan Murty, S P Arun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

N Apurva Ratan MurtyCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2191-797X
S P ArunCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India sparun@cns.iisc.ernet.in.ORCID 0000-0001-9602-5066

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance 500027-Z-09-Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We effortlessly recognize objects across changes in viewpoint, but we know relatively little about the features that underlie viewpoint invariance in the brain. Here, we set out to characterize how viewpoint invariance in monkey inferior temporal (IT) neurons is influenced by two image manipulations-silhouetting and inversion. Reducing an object into its silhouette removes internal detail, so this would reveal how much viewpoint invariance depends on the external contours. Inverting an object retains but rearranges features, so this would reveal how much viewpoint invariance depends on the arrangement and orientation of features. Our main findings are

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsForm PerceptionHaplorhiniMicroelectrodesNeuronsPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationTemporal LobeVisual Cortexinvarianceobject recognitionshape codingviewpoint

Identifiers

PMID28381484
PMCPMC5501916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.