Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28381462›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2017

Renal cell carcinoma: new insights and challenges for a clinician scientist.

Roman Shingarev, Edgar A Jaimes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exosomes in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Renal Cell Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Kidney Cancer Risk Associated with Historic Groundwater Trichloroethylene Contamination.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roman ShingarevRenal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Edgar A JaimesRenal Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York jaimese@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing recognition of the complex interplay between renal cell cancer (RCC), kidney function, mechanical reduction of nephron mass, and systemic agents targeting the cancer. Earlier detection of RCC and rising life expectancy of cancer survivors places a greater emphasis on preservation of renal function after cancer resection and during systemic therapy. Unique adverse effects associated with RCC drugs not only help reveal cancer pathophysiology but also expand our knowledge of normal cell signaling and metabolism. In this review, we outline our current understanding of RCC biology and treatment, their bidirectional relationship with kidney function, and unmet research needs in this field.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsPhysiciansResearch PersonnelAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBiomedical ResearchGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyNephrectomyPhenotypeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumormolecularly targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitionradical and partial nephrectomyrenal cell carcinoma genotyping

Identifiers

PMID28381462
PMCPMC5582896
OpenAlexW2605205463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.