Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28381412›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2017

The DDR at telomeres lacking intact shelterin does not require substantial chromatin decompaction.

Leonid A Timashev, Hazen Babcock, Xiaowei Zhuang, Titia de Lange

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Altered Functions of Shelterin Components in ALT Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Leonid A TimashevLaboratory for Cell Biology and Genetics, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Hazen BabcockCenter for Advanced Imaging, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Xiaowei ZhuangCenter for Advanced Imaging, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Titia de LangeLaboratory for Cell Biology and Genetics, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Rockefeller University · USAdvanced Imaging Research (United States) · USHarvard University · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF TELOMERE INDUCED SENESCENCER01AG016642 · NIA · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI Titia de Lange · 1999 to 2026
$11.9M
Genome instability in cancer: telomeres and DNA repairR35CA210036 · NCI · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI Titia de Lange · 2016 to 2026
$10.8M
Single-molecule studies of ATP-dependent chromatin remodelingR01GM105637 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI ZHUANG, XIAOWEI · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
Mechanism of the telomeric proliferation limitR56AG016642 · NIA · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI DE LANGE, TITIA · 2019 to 2019
$598k
2016 SETAC Asia/Pacific ConferenceR13ES027302 · NIEHS · SOCIETY/ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY/CHEM · PI MENZIE, CHARLES · 2016 to 2016
$6k
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA210036NIA NIH HHS R01 AG016642NIA NIH HHS R56 AG016642NIEHS NIH HHS 27302C0028NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telomeres are protected by shelterin, a six-subunit protein complex that represses the DNA damage response (DDR) at chromosome ends. Extensive data suggest that TRF2 in shelterin remodels telomeres into the t-loop structure, thereby hiding telomere ends from double-stranded break repair and ATM signaling, whereas POT1 represses ATR signaling by excluding RPA. An alternative protection mechanism was suggested recently by which shelterin subunits TRF1, TRF2, and TIN2 mediate telomeric chromatin compaction, which was proposed to minimize access of DDR factors. We performed superresolution imaging of telomeres in mouse cells after conditional deletion of TRF1, TRF2, or both, the latter of which results in the complete loss of shelterin. Upon removal of TRF1 or TRF2, we observed only minor changes in the telomere volume in most of our experiments. Upon codeletion of TRF1 and TRF2, the telomere volume increased by varying amounts, but even those samples exhibiting small changes in telomere volume showed DDR at nearly all telomeres. Upon shelterin removal, telomeres underwent 53BP1-dependent clustering, potentially explaining at least in part the apparent increase in telomere volume. Furthermore, chromatin accessibility, as determined by ATAC-seq (assay for transposase-accessible chromatin [ATAC] with high-throughput sequencing), was not substantially altered by shelterin removal. These results suggest that the DDR induced by shelterin removal does not require substantial telomere decompaction.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsCells, CulturedChromatinMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceTelomereTelomeric Repeat Binding Protein 1Telomeric Repeat Binding Protein 2Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1ChromatinTelomeric Repeat Binding Protein 1Telomeric Repeat Binding Protein 2TRF2 protein, mouseTrp53bp1 protein, mouseTumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1chromatinDNA damage responseshelterinSTORM imagingtelomeret loop

Identifiers

PMID28381412
PMCPMC5393053
OpenAlexW2604996055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.