Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28381231›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

Exposure to household furry pets influences the gut microbiota of infant at 3-4 months following various birth scenarios.

Hein M Tun, Theodore Konya, Tim K Takaro, Jeffrey R Brook, Radha Chari, Catherine J Field, David S Guttman, Allan B Becker, Piush J Mandhane, Stuart E Turvey and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
49.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 277 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The role of dog keeping in the home microbiota and its impact on children's health.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hein M TunDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, 3-527 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87th Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G IC9, Canada.
Theodore KonyaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tim K TakaroFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Jeffrey R BrookDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Radha ChariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Catherine J FieldDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
David S GuttmanCentre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Allan B BeckerDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Piush J MandhaneDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, 3-527 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87th Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G IC9, Canada.
Stuart E TurveyDepartment of Pediatrics, Child & Family Research Institute, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Padmaja SubbaraoDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Malcolm R SearsDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
James A ScottDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anita L KozyrskyjDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, 3-527 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87th Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G IC9, Canada. kozyrsky@ualberta.ca.
CHILD Study Investigators
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR 227312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-life exposure to household pets has the capacity to reduce risk for overweight and allergic disease, especially following caesarean delivery. Since there is some evidence that pets also alter the gut microbial composition of infants, changes to the gut microbiome are putative pathways by which pet exposure can reduce these risks to health. To investigate the impact of pre- and postnatal pet exposure on infant gut microbiota following various birth scenarios, this study employed a large subsample of 746 infants from the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development Study (CHILD) cohort, whose mothers were enrolled during pregnancy between 2009 and 2012. Participating mothers were asked to report on household pet ownership at recruitment during the second or third trimester and 3 months postpartum. Infant gut microbiota were profiled with 16S rRNA sequencing from faecal samples collected at the mean age of 3.3 months. Two categories of pet exposure (i) only during pregnancy and (ii) pre- and postnatally were compared to no pet exposure under different birth scenarios.

resultsOver half of studied infants were exposed to at least one furry pet in the prenatal and/or postnatal periods, of which 8% were exposed in pregnancy alone and 46.8% had exposure during both time periods. As a common effect in all birth scenarios, pre- and postnatal pet exposure enriched the abundance of Oscillospira and/or Ruminococcus (P < 0.05) with more than a twofold greater likelihood of high abundance. Among vaginally born infants with maternal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis exposure, Streptococcaceae were substantially and significantly reduced by pet exposure (P < 0.001, FDRp = 0.03), reflecting an 80% decreased likelihood of high abundance (OR 0.20, 95%CI, 0.06-0.70) for pet exposure during pregnancy alone and a 69% reduced likelihood (OR 0.31, 95%CI, 0.16-0.58) for exposure in the pre- and postnatal time periods. All of these associations were independent of maternal asthma/allergy status, siblingship, breastfeeding exclusivity and other home characteristics.

conclusionsThe impact of pet ownership varies under different birth scenarios; however, in common, exposure to pets increased the abundance of two bacteria, Ruminococcus and Oscillospira, which have been negatively associated with childhood atopy and obesity.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAntibiotic ProphylaxisAsthmaBacteriaBreast FeedingCanadaCesarean SectionCohort StudiesFecesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansHypersensitivityInfantRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBirthInfant gut microbiotaPetsPostnatalPrenatal

Identifiers

PMID28381231
PMCPMC5382463
OpenAlexW2605060994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.