Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28380635›Full record

ReviewNeuro-oncology2017

Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues.

Arjun Sahgal, Mark Ruschin, Lijun Ma, Wilko Verbakel, David Larson, Paul D Brown

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05477316 (A Single-arm Pilot Study, to Assess the Efficacy of Cerebellar IMRT Combined With Cerebral SRS in Patients With Brain Metastases That Are Predominantly in the Posterior Fossa - a Novel Treatment Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05477316 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Single-arm Pilot Study, to Assess the Efficacy of Cerebellar IMRT Combined With Cerebral SRS in Patients With Brain Metastases That Are Predominantly in the Posterior Fossa - a Novel Treatment Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorHadassah Medical OrganizationRan2021 to 2024Enrolled37ConditionsBrain Metastases, Posterior Fossa Lesion, Cerebral LesionArmsRadiation treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Revisiting the Role of Surgical Resection for Brain Metastasis.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  19. Long-term neurocognitive function after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of immunotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark RuschinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lijun MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Wilko VerbakelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam,The Netherlands.
David LarsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past three decades several randomized trials have enabled evidence-based practice for patients presenting with limited brain metastases. These trials have focused on the role of surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). As a result, it is clear that local control should be optimized with surgery or SRS in patients with optimal prognostic factors presenting with up to 4 brain metastases. The routine use of adjuvant WBRT remains debatable, as although greater distant brain control rates are observed, there is no impact on survival, and modern outcomes suggest adverse effects from WBRT on patient cognition and quality of life. With dramatic technologic advances in radiation oncology facilitating the adoption of SRS into mainstream practice, the optimal management of patients with multiple brain metastases is now being put forward. Practice is evolving to SRS alone in these patients despite a lack of level 1 evidence to support a clinical departure from WBRT. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of the evidence for patients presenting with limited and multiple metastases, and to present an in-depth analysis of the technology and dosimetric issues specific to the treatment of multiple metastases.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomebrain metastasesmultiple metastasesradiosurgerystereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID28380635
PMCPMC5463499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.