Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28380068›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Mouse fitness measures reveal incomplete functional redundancy of Hox paralogous group 1 proteins.

James S Ruff, Raed B Saffarini, Leda L Ramoz, Linda C Morrison, Shambralyn Baker, Sean M Laverty, Petr Tvrdik, Mario R Capecchi, Wayne K Potts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. News Feature: What happens when lab animals go wild.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James S RuffDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8292-8640
Raed B SaffariniDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Leda L RamozDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Linda C MorrisonDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Shambralyn BakerDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Sean M LavertyDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, Oklahoma, United States of America.
Petr TvrdikDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Mario R CapecchiDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Wayne K PottsDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
University of Utah · USUniversity of Central Oklahoma · US

Funding

SELECTIVE MECHANISMS MAINTAINING H-2 POLYMORPHISMSR01GM039578 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI POTTS, WAYNE K. · 1989 to 2007
$2.0M
The role of sex in the evolution and spread of virulent infectious diseaseR01GM109500 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ADLER, FREDERICK R., POTTS, WAYNE K. · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM039578NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we assess the fitness consequences of the replacement of the Hoxa1 coding region with its paralog Hoxb1 in mice (Mus musculus) residing in semi-natural enclosures. Previously, this Hoxa1B1 swap was reported as resulting in no discernible embryonic or physiological phenotype (i.e., functionally redundant), despite the 51% amino acid sequence differences between these two Hox proteins. Within heterozygous breeding cages no differences in litter size nor deviations from Mendelian genotypic expectations were observed in the outbred progeny; however, within semi-natural population enclosures mice homozygous for the Hoxa1B1 swap were out-reproduced by controls resulting in the mutant allele being only 87.5% as frequent as the control in offspring born within enclosures. Specifically, Hoxa1B1 founders produced only 77.9% as many offspring relative to controls, as measured by homozygous pups, and a 22.1% deficiency of heterozygous offspring was also observed. These data suggest that Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 have diverged in function through either sub- or neo-functionalization and that the HoxA1 and HoxB1 proteins are not mutually interchangeable when expressed from the Hoxa1 locus. The fitness assays conducted under naturalistic conditions in this study have provided an ultimate-level assessment of the postulated equivalence of competing alleles. Characterization of these differences has provided greater understanding of the forces shaping the maintenance and diversifications of Hox genes as well as other paralogous genes. This fitness assay approach can be applied to any genetic manipulation and often provides the most sensitive way to detect functional differences.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsBreedingFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic FitnessGenetic LociHeterozygoteHomeobox A1 ProteinHomeodomain ProteinsHomozygoteMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPhenotypeHomeobox A1 ProteinHomeodomain ProteinsHOXB1 homeodomain proteinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28380068
PMCPMC5381901
OpenAlexW2604246443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.