Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379859›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in ophthalmology2017

Refractive error in underserved adults: causes and potential solutions.

V Swetha E Jeganathan, Alan L Robin, Maria A Woodward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V Swetha E JeganathanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kellogg Eye Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor bDepartment of Ophthalmology and International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore cInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Alan L Robin
Maria A Woodward
Michigan Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Telemedicine For Anterior Eye DiseasesK23EY023596 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WOODWARD, MARIA ANNEKE · 2013 to 2017
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY023596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo evaluate the epidemiology of uncorrected refractive errors (URE) in adults both in the United States and globally, health outcomes impacted by URE, common barriers to treatment, and propose potential interventions. RECENT FNDINGS: URE is the main cause of visual impairment and the second leading cause of blindness globally. Rates of URE are rising, and cause disability that reduces productivity, economic earnings, and the quality of life of affected individuals. Economic barriers, healthcare access, and sociocultural constraints are among the most fundamental barriers to correcting URE. However, innovative approaches are poised to lower rates of URE. SUMMARY: URE is a leading cause of preventable visual impairment with serious health consequences. Numerous social and financial barriers are associated with the high prevalence of URE in low-income adults. Novel delivery programs for eyeglasses and programs to provide refractive surgery to correct refractive error could decrease rates of URE.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAge FactorsBlindnessCost of IllnessDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansIncomeOphthalmologyPrevalenceQuality of LifeRefractive ErrorsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28379859
PMCPMC5538586
OpenAlexW2604791473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.