Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379643›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2017

Integrating In Vitro, Modeling, and In Vivo Approaches to Investigate Warfarin Bioequivalence.

X Zhang, H Wen, J Fan, B Vince, T Li, W Gao, M Kinjo, J Brown, W Sun, W Jiang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Formulation of metoclopramide HCl gastroretentive film andSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

X ZhangOffice of Generic Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
H WenOffice of Generic Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
J FanOffice of Generic Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
B VinceVince and Associates Clinical Research Inc, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
T LiDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
W GaoDepartment of Industrial and Physical Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
M KinjoOffice of Generic Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
J BrownOffice of Translational Sciences, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
W SunOffice of Translational Sciences, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
W JiangOffice of Generic Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
R LionbergerOffice of Generic Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USAltasciences Clinical Research Vince & Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrate the use of modeling and simulation to investigate bioequivalence (BE) concerns raised about generic warfarin products. To test the hypothesis that the loss of isopropyl alcohol and slow dissolution in acidic pH has significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin sodium tablets, we conducted physiologically based pharmacokinetic absorption modeling and simulation using formulation factors or in vitro dissolution profiles as input parameters. Sensitivity analyses indicated that warfarin pharmacokinetics was not sensitive to solubility, particle size, density, or dissolution rate in pH 4.5, but was affected by dissolution rate in pH 6.8 and potency. Virtual BE studies suggested that stressed warfarin sodium tablets with slow dissolution rate in pH 4.5 but having similar dissolution rate in pH 6.8 would be bioequivalent to the unstressed warfarin sodium tablets. A four-way, crossover, single-dose BE study in healthy subjects was conducted to test the same hypothesis and confirmed the simulation conclusion.

Indexed as

AdultAnticoagulantsCross-Over StudiesDrugs, GenericFemaleHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalRandom AllocationTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyWarfarinYoung AdultAnticoagulantsDrugs, GenericTabletsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID28379643
PMCPMC5572358
OpenAlexW2604381002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.