Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379635›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2017

Pharmacometric Modeling of Liver Metastases' Diameter, Volume, and Density and Their Relation to Clinical Outcome in Imatinib-Treated Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

E Schindler, S M Krishnan, Rhj Mathijssen, A Ruggiero, G Schiavon, L E Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Progress and Opportunities to Advance Clinical Cancer Therapeutics Using Tumor Dynamic Models.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E SchindlerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
S M KrishnanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rhj MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A RuggieroDepartment of Radiology, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge, CB23 3RE, United Kingdom.
G SchiavonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L E FribergDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional and density-based tumor metrics have been suggested to better discriminate tumor response to treatment than unidimensional metrics, particularly for tumors exhibiting nonuniform size changes. In the developed pharmacometric modeling framework based on data from 77 imatinib-treated gastrointestinal patients, the time-courses of liver metastases' maximum transaxial diameters, software-calculated actual volumes (V

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsLiver NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansImatinib MesylateKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProtein Kinase InhibitorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28379635
PMCPMC5529749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.