Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379608›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Neural mechanisms for integrating consecutive and interleaved natural events.

Juha M Lahnakoski, Iiro P Jääskeläinen, Mikko Sams, Lauri Nummenmaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rethinking Naturalistic Movie Neuroimaging Through Film Form.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Living on the edge: network neuroscience beyond nodes.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Topology of Functional Connectivity and Hub Dynamics in the Beta Band As Temporal Prior for Natural Vision in the Human Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juha M LahnakoskiDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (NBE), School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, FI-00076, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5223-7822
Iiro P JääskeläinenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (NBE), School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, FI-00076, Finland.
Mikko SamsDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (NBE), School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, FI-00076, Finland.
Lauri NummenmaaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, FI-20521, Finland.

Funding

Aalto University (aivoAALTO and Aalto Science IT projects)Academy of Finland #129670Academy of Finland #130412Academy of Finland #138145Academy of Finland #276643Doctoral program "Brain & Mind."European Research Council #313000 to LNFinnish Cultural Foundation #150496 to JL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand temporally extended events, the human brain needs to accumulate information continuously across time. Interruptions that require switching of attention to other event sequences disrupt this process. To reveal neural mechanisms supporting integration of event information, we measured brain activity with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) from 18 participants while they viewed 6.5-minute excerpts from three movies (i) consecutively and (ii) as interleaved segments of approximately 50-s in duration. We measured inter-subject reliability of brain activity by calculating inter-subject correlations (ISC) of fMRI signals and analyzed activation timecourses with a general linear model (GLM). Interleaving decreased the ISC in posterior temporal lobes, medial prefrontal cortex, superior precuneus, medial occipital cortex, and cerebellum. In the GLM analyses, posterior temporal lobes were activated more consistently by instances of speech when the movies were viewed consecutively than as interleaved segments. By contrast, low-level auditory and visual stimulus features and editing boundaries caused similar activity patterns in both conditions. In the medial occipital cortex, decreases in ISC were seen in short bursts throughout the movie clips. By contrast, the other areas showed longer-lasting differences in ISC during isolated scenes depicting socially-relevant and suspenseful content, such as deception or inter-subject conflict. The areas in the posterior temporal lobes also showed sustained activity during continuous actions and were deactivated when actions ended at scene boundaries. Our results suggest that the posterior temporal and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices, as well as the cerebellum and dorsal precuneus, support integration of events into coherent event sequences. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3360-3376, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

conflictinterleaved processingmoviesocial perceptionspeechtemporal integration

Identifiers

PMID28379608
PMCPMC6866821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.