Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379525›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2018

Local activation time sampling density for atrial tachycardia contact mapping: how much is enough?

Steven E Williams, James L Harrison, Henry Chubb, John Whitaker, Radek Kiedrowicz, Christopher A Rinaldi, Michael Cooklin, Matthew Wright, Steven Niederer, Mark D O'Neill

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Initial multicenter experience with a new high-density coloring module: impact for complex atrial arrhythmias interpretation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Utility of a ripple map for the interpretation of atrial propagation during atrial tachycardia.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven E WilliamsDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London.
James L HarrisonDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London.
Henry ChubbDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London.
John WhitakerDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London.
Radek KiedrowiczDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London, UK.
Christopher A RinaldiDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London, UK.
Michael CooklinDepartment of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London, UK.
Matthew WrightDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London.
Steven NiedererDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London.
Mark D O'NeillDivision of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, 4th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, 249 Westminster Bridge Road, SE1 7EH London.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBKing's College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/13/37/30280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Local activation time (LAT) mapping forms the cornerstone of atrial tachycardia diagnosis. Although anatomic and positional accuracy of electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems have been validated, the effect of electrode sampling density on LAT map reconstruction is not known. Here, we study the effect of chamber geometry and activation complexity on optimal LAT sampling density using a combined in silico and in vivo approach. Methods and results: In vivo 21 atrial tachycardia maps were studied in three groups: (1) focal activation, (2) macro-re-entry, and (3) localized re-entry. In silico activation was simulated on a 4×4cm atrial monolayer, sampled randomly at 0.25-10 points/cm2 and used to re-interpolate LAT maps. Activation patterns were studied in the geometrically simple porcine right atrium (RA) and complex human left atrium (LA). Activation complexity was introduced into the porcine RA by incomplete inter-caval linear ablation. In all cases, optimal sampling density was defined as the highest density resulting in minimal further error reduction in the re-interpolated maps. Optimal sampling densities for LA tachycardias were 0.67 ± 0.17 points/cm2 (focal activation), 1.05 ± 0.32 points/cm2 (macro-re-entry) and 1.23 ± 0.26 points/cm2 (localized re-entry), P = 0.0031. Increasing activation complexity was associated with increased optimal sampling density both in silico (focal activation 1.09 ± 0.14 points/cm2; re-entry 1.44 ± 0.49 points/cm2; spiral-wave 1.50 ± 0.34 points/cm2, P < 0.0001) and in vivo (porcine RA pre-ablation 0.45 ± 0.13 vs. post-ablation 0.78 ± 0.17 points/cm2, P = 0.0008). Increasing chamber geometry was also associated with increased optimal sampling density (0.61 ± 0.22 points/cm2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.34 points/cm2, P = 0.0015). Conclusion: Optimal sampling densities can be identified to maximize diagnostic yield of LAT maps. Greater sampling density is required to correctly reveal complex activation and represent activation across complex geometries. Overall, the optimal sampling density for LAT map interpolation defined in this study was ∼1.0-1.5 points/cm2.

Indexed as

Atrial FunctionElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacAction PotentialsAnimalsCardiac Pacing, ArtificialComputer SimulationDisease Models, AnimalHeart AtriaHeart RateHumansModels, CardiovascularPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSwineSwine, MiniatureTachycardia, SupraventricularAtrial arrhythmiasElectroanatomic mapping systemsLocal activation time mappingSampling density

Identifiers

PMID28379525
PMCPMC5834039
OpenAlexW2604627156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.