Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379511›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2017

Animal Research on Nicotine Reduction: Current Evidence and Research Gaps.

Tracy T Smith, Laura E Rupprecht, Rachel L Denlinger-Apte, Jillian J Weeks, Rachel S Panas, Eric C Donny, Alan F Sved

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Rewarding Effects of Nicotine in Adolescent and Adult Male and Female Rats as Measured Using Intracranial Self-stimulation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  11. Research on Behavioral Discrimination of Nicotine May Inform FDA Policy on Setting a Maximum Nicotine Content in Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Reducing the Prevalence of Smoking: Policy Measures and Focusing on Specific Populations.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tracy T SmithUniversity of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Laura E RupprechtCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Rachel L Denlinger-ApteDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Jillian J WeeksCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Rachel S PanasCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Eric C DonnyDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Alan F SvedDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · USBrown University · US

Funding

VERY LOW NICOTINE CIGARETTES IN SMOKERS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIAU54DA031659 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DONNY, ERIC CHRISTIAN · 2011 to 2022
$64.7M
Translational Research Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA186873 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Kathryn H. Schmitz, Jian-Min Yuan · 2014 to 2026
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA186873NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA031659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mandated reduction in the nicotine content of cigarettes may improve public health by reducing the prevalence of smoking. Animal self-administration research is an important complement to clinical research on nicotine reduction. It can fill research gaps that may be difficult to address with clinical research, guide clinical researchers about variables that are likely to be important in their own research, and provide policy makers with converging evidence between clinical and preclinical studies about the potential impact of a nicotine reduction policy. Convergence between clinical and preclinical research is important, given the ease with which clinical trial participants can access nonstudy tobacco products in the current marketplace. Herein, we review contributions of preclinical animal research, with a focus on rodent self-administration, to the science of nicotine reduction. Throughout this review, we highlight areas where clinical and preclinical research converge and areas where the two differ. Preclinical research has provided data on many important topics such as the threshold for nicotine reinforcement, the likelihood of compensation, moderators of the impact of nicotine reduction, the impact of environmental stimuli on nicotine reduction, the impact of nonnicotine cigarette smoke constituents on nicotine reduction, and the impact of nicotine reduction on vulnerable populations. Special attention is paid to current research gaps including the dramatic rise in alternative tobacco products, including electronic nicotine delivery systems (ie, e-cigarettes). The evidence reviewed here will be critical for policy makers as well as clinical researchers interested in nicotine reduction. IMPLICATIONS: This review will provide policy makers and clinical researchers interested in nicotine reduction with an overview of the preclinical animal research conducted on nicotine reduction and the regulatory implications of that research. The review also highlights the utility of preclinical research for research questions related to nicotine reduction.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalNicotinePublic HealthResearch DesignTobacco Use DisorderAnimalsSelf AdministrationNicotine

Identifiers

PMID28379511
PMCPMC5896531
OpenAlexW2604939588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.