Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379477›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

Strong FGFR3 staining is a marker for FGFR3 fusions in diffuse gliomas.

Kirsi J Granberg, Matti Annala, Birgitta Lehtinen, Juha Kesseli, Joonas Haapasalo, Pekka Ruusuvuori, Olli Yli-Harja, Tapio Visakorpi, Hannu Haapasalo, Matti Nykter and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Targeting FGFR for cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Diffuse Gliomas withCancers · 2024
    Review
  8. RT-PCR assay to detectNeuro-oncology practice · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. FGFR3-TACCs3 Fusions and Their Clinical Relevance in Human Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. HSP90-CDC37 functions as a chaperone for the oncogenic FGFR3-TACC3 fusion.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. FGFR- gene family alterations in low-grade neuroepithelial tumors.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kirsi J GranbergBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Matti AnnalaBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Birgitta LehtinenBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Juha KesseliBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Joonas HaapasaloBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Pekka RuusuvuoriBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Olli Yli-HarjaBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Tapio VisakorpiBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Hannu HaapasaloBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Matti NykterBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Wei ZhangBioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland; Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Science Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Fimlab Laboratories Ltd., Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Unit of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Pori unit, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland; Department of Pathology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Cancer Biology, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Funding

Characterization of oncogenic FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene in glioblastomaR01CA183153 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ZHANG, WEI · 2014 to 2019
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) have recently arisen as a promising treatment option for patients with FGFR alterations. Gene fusions involving FGFR3 and transforming acidic coiled-coil protein 3 (TACC3) have been detected in diffuse gliomas and other malignancies, and fusion-positive cases have responded well to FGFR inhibition. As high FGFR3 expression has been detected in fusion-positive tumors, we sought to determine the clinical significance of FGFR3 protein expression level as well as its potential for indicating FGFR3 fusions.

methodsWe performed FGFR3 immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing 676 grades II-IV astrocytomas and 116 grades II-III oligodendroglial tumor specimens. Fifty-one cases were further analyzed using targeted sequencing.

resultsModerate to strong FGFR3 staining was detected in gliomas of all grades, was more common in females, and was associated with poor survival in diffuse astrocytomas. Targeted sequencing identified FGFR3-TACC3 fusions and an FGFR3-CAMK2A fusion in 10 of 15 strongly stained cases, whereas no fusions were found in 36 negatively to moderately stained cases. Fusion-positive cases were predominantly female and negative for IDH and EGFR/PDGFRA/MET alterations. These and moderately stained cases show lower MIB-1 proliferation index than negatively to weakly stained cases. Furthermore, stronger FGFR3 expression was commonly observed in malignant tissue regions of lower cellularity in fusion-negative cases. Importantly, subregional negative FGFR3 staining was also observed in a few fusion-positive cases.

conclusionsStrong FGFR3 protein expression is indicative of FGFR3 fusions and may serve as a clinically applicable predictive marker for treatment regimens based on FGFR inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedOncogene FusionReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3Biomarkers, TumorFGFR3 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3TACC3 protein, humanbiomarkergene fusionglioblastomatargeted sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28379477
PMCPMC5570261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.