Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379374›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2017

Ebola Virus Disease and Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients Managed at 5 Ebola Treatment Units in West Africa.

Patricia C Henwood, Lisa M Bebell, Reshma Roshania, Vanessa Wolfman, Michaela Mallow, Anushka Kalyanpur, Adam C Levine

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ebola virus disease in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Atypical clinical presentation of Ebola virus disease in pregnancy: Implications for clinical and public health management.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia C HenwoodDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lisa M BebellDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Global Health, Boston.
Reshma RoshaniaInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, California.
Vanessa WolfmanInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, California.
Michaela MallowInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, California.
Anushka KalyanpurInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, California.
Adam C LevineInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, California.
International Medical Corps · USBrown University · USCenter for Global Health · USHarvard University · US

Funding

PROGRAM FOR AIDS CLINICAL RESEARCH TRAINING (PACRT)T32AI007433 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARK J SIEDNER · 1992 to 2026
$11.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReliable data are lacking on pregnancy outcomes during Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemics. We aimed to characterize symptoms and outcomes among pregnant women admitted to Ebola treatment units (ETUs) with suspected and confirmed EVD to better inform obstetric management.

methodsWe analyzed a retrospective cohort of reproductive-aged women presenting to 5 West African ETUs from September 2014 to September 2015. We compared clinical symptoms, risk of EVD diagnosis, and mortality between pregnant and nonpregnant women.

resultsOf 729 reproductive-aged women admitted to study ETUs, 44 (6%) reported pregnancy. Thirteen of 44 pregnant women (30%) tested EVD positive; 6 of 13 (46%) died. Pregnant women were less likely than nonpregnant women to report anorexia, asthenia, diarrhea, fever, myalgias/arthralgias, nausea, or vomiting (P < .05) at admission. Pregnant women with suspected EVD had the same risk, however, of laboratory-confirmed EVD (30% vs 24%, P = .38). While pregnant women with confirmed EVD had similar Ebola viral loads on presentation to nonpregnant women, as measured by initial cycle threshold (26.4 vs 23.2, P = .16), they were less likely to have myalgias/arthralgias (P< .001) and vomiting (P = .02). Both all-cause mortality (14% vs 19%, P = .39) and EVD-specific mortality (46% vs 54%, P = .60) were not significantly different between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Two neonates born live in the ETU died within 8 days.

conclusionsWe find no evidence to support a difference in the risk of death between pregnant women with suspected or confirmed EVD compared to nonpregnant women. Limited data suggest poor fetal and neonatal outcomes in EVD-affected pregnancies.

Indexed as

Hemorrhagic Fever, EbolaPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdultCohort StudiesDisease OutbreaksEbolavirusFemaleFeverHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLiberiaMaternal MortalityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeEbola virus diseaseLiberiamaternal mortalitypregnantSierra Leone

Identifiers

PMID28379374
PMCPMC5850452
OpenAlexW2604308370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.