Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379368›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

SCODE: an efficient regulatory network inference algorithm from single-cell RNA-Seq during differentiation.

Hirotaka Matsumoto, Hisanori Kiryu, Chikara Furusawa, Minoru S H Ko, Shigeru B H Ko, Norio Gouda, Tetsutaro Hayashi, Itoshi Nikaido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 240 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
240citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

240 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hirotaka MatsumotoBioinformatics Research Unit, Advanced Center for Computing and Communication, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Hisanori KiryuDepartment of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan.
Chikara FurusawaQuantitative Biology Center (QBiC), RIKEN, Suita, Osaka 565-0874, Japan.
Minoru S H KoDepartment of Systems Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Shigeru B H KoDepartment of Systems Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Norio GoudaDepartment of Systems Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
Tetsutaro HayashiBioinformatics Research Unit, Advanced Center for Computing and Communication, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Itoshi NikaidoBioinformatics Research Unit, Advanced Center for Computing and Communication, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe analysis of RNA-Seq data from individual differentiating cells enables us to reconstruct the differentiation process and the degree of differentiation (in pseudo-time) of each cell. Such analyses can reveal detailed expression dynamics and functional relationships for differentiation. To further elucidate differentiation processes, more insight into gene regulatory networks is required. The pseudo-time can be regarded as time information and, therefore, single-cell RNA-Seq data are time-course data with high time resolution. Although time-course data are useful for inferring networks, conventional inference algorithms for such data suffer from high time complexity when the number of samples and genes is large. Therefore, a novel algorithm is necessary to infer networks from single-cell RNA-Seq during differentiation.

resultsIn this study, we developed the novel and efficient algorithm SCODE to infer regulatory networks, based on ordinary differential equations. We applied SCODE to three single-cell RNA-Seq datasets and confirmed that SCODE can reconstruct observed expression dynamics. We evaluated SCODE by comparing its inferred networks with use of a DNaseI-footprint based network. The performance of SCODE was best for two of the datasets and nearly best for the remaining dataset. We also compared the runtimes and showed that the runtimes for SCODE are significantly shorter than for alternatives. Thus, our algorithm provides a promising approach for further single-cell differentiation analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R source code of SCODE is available at https://github.com/hmatsu1226/SCODE. CONTACT: hirotaka.matsumoto@riken.jp. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksSoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansMiceSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID28379368
PMCPMC5860123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.