Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379348›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

BEESEM: estimation of binding energy models using HT-SELEX data.

Shuxiang Ruan, S Joshua Swamidass, Gary D Stormo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. aBIOTECH · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. DNA-Protein Binding is Dominated by Short Anchoring Elements.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuxiang RuanDepartment of Genetics.
S Joshua SwamidassDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis 63110, USA.
Gary D StormoDepartment of Genetics.

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOMIC SCIENCET32HG000045 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL R BRENT, Barak A Cohen · 1997 to 2026
$8.4M
DNA PATTERN IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSISR01HG000249 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI STORMO, GARY D · 1990 to 2017
$5.6M
DATA AND TOOLS FOR MODELING METABOLISM AND REACTIVITYR01LM012222 · NLM · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, GROVER P, SWAMIDASS, SANJAY JOSHUA · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Computationally modeling the impact of ontogeny on drug metabolic fateR01LM012482 · NLM · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI MILLER, GROVER P, SWAMIDASS, SANJAY JOSHUA · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000249NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000045NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012222NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationCharacterizing the binding specificities of transcription factors (TFs) is crucial to the study of gene expression regulation. Recently developed high-throughput experimental methods, including protein binding microarrays (PBM) and high-throughput SELEX (HT-SELEX), have enabled rapid measurements of the specificities for hundreds of TFs. However, few studies have developed efficient algorithms for estimating binding motifs based on HT-SELEX data. Also the simple method of constructing a position weight matrix (PWM) by comparing the frequency of the preferred sequence with single-nucleotide variants has the risk of generating motifs with higher information content than the true binding specificity.

resultsWe developed an algorithm called BEESEM that builds on a comprehensive biophysical model of protein-DNA interactions, which is trained using the expectation maximization method. BEESEM is capable of selecting the optimal motif length and calculating the confidence intervals of estimated parameters. By comparing BEESEM with the published motifs estimated using the same HT-SELEX data, we demonstrate that BEESEM provides significant improvements. We also evaluate several motif discovery algorithms on independent PBM and ChIP-seq data. BEESEM provides significantly better fits to in vitro data, but its performance is similar to some other methods on in vivo data under the criterion of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). This highlights the limitations of the purely rank-based AUROC criterion. Using quantitative binding data to assess models, however, demonstrates that BEESEM improves on prior models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available on the web at http://stormo.wustl.edu/resources.html . CONTACT: stormo@wustl.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareThermodynamicsAlgorithmsAnimalsBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNAHumansMicePosition-Specific Scoring MatricesProtein Array AnalysisProtein BindingSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28379348
PMCPMC5860122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.