ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
BEESEM: estimation of binding energy models using HT-SELEX data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- ShapeME: A Tool and Web Front-end for De Novo Discovery of Structural Motifs Underpinning Protein-DNA Interactions.Journal of molecular biology · 2026Article
- Sequence-based modeling of low-affinity transcription factor-DNA binding through deep learning.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Predicting the DNA binding specificity of transcription factor mutants using family-level biophysically interpretable machine learning.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- DNA-Protein Binding is Dominated by Short Anchoring Elements.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Experimental approaches to investigate biophysical interactions between homeodomain transcription factors and DNA.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms · 2025Review
- ShapeME: A tool and web front-end for de novo discovery of structural motifs underpinning protein-DNA interactions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Perspectives on Codebook: sequence specificity of uncharacterized human transcription factors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Predicting the molecular functions of regulatory genetic variants associated with cancer.Oncotarget · 2023Article
- Hidden modes of DNA binding by human nuclear receptors.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Prediction of cooperative homeodomain DNA binding sites from high-throughput-SELEX data.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- DNA binding specificity of all four Saccharomyces cerevisiae forkhead transcription factors.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Top-Down Crawl: a method for the ultra-rapid and motif-free alignment of sequences with associated binding metrics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- PRIESSTESS: interpretable, high-performing models of the sequence and structure preferences of RNA-binding proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity from sequencing data with interpretable machine learning.Nature biotechnology · 2022Article
- Article
- Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment Technologies and Aptamer-Based Applications: Recent Progress and Challenges in Precision Medicine of Infectious Diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Sharing DNA-binding information across structurally similar proteins enables accurate specificity determination.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- JASPAR 2020: update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Low-Affinity Binding Sites and the Transcription Factor Specificity Paradox in Eukaryotes.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCharacterizing the binding specificities of transcription factors (TFs) is crucial to the study of gene expression regulation. Recently developed high-throughput experimental methods, including protein binding microarrays (PBM) and high-throughput SELEX (HT-SELEX), have enabled rapid measurements of the specificities for hundreds of TFs. However, few studies have developed efficient algorithms for estimating binding motifs based on HT-SELEX data. Also the simple method of constructing a position weight matrix (PWM) by comparing the frequency of the preferred sequence with single-nucleotide variants has the risk of generating motifs with higher information content than the true binding specificity.
resultsWe developed an algorithm called BEESEM that builds on a comprehensive biophysical model of protein-DNA interactions, which is trained using the expectation maximization method. BEESEM is capable of selecting the optimal motif length and calculating the confidence intervals of estimated parameters. By comparing BEESEM with the published motifs estimated using the same HT-SELEX data, we demonstrate that BEESEM provides significant improvements. We also evaluate several motif discovery algorithms on independent PBM and ChIP-seq data. BEESEM provides significantly better fits to in vitro data, but its performance is similar to some other methods on in vivo data under the criterion of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). This highlights the limitations of the purely rank-based AUROC criterion. Using quantitative binding data to assess models, however, demonstrates that BEESEM improves on prior models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available on the web at http://stormo.wustl.edu/resources.html . CONTACT: stormo@wustl.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.