Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379135›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Complementary codes for odor identity and intensity in olfactory cortex.

Kevin A Bolding, Kevin M Franks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Temporal sequence geometry enables odor recognition and generalization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Projection-specific Routing of Odor Information in the Olfactory Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Simultaneous detection and estimation in olfactory sensing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin A BoldingDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-5280
Kevin M FranksDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6386-9518

Funding

Odor Coding in Piriform CortexR01DC015525 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Kevin Franks · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
Synaptic Processes Mediating Cortical Odor CodingR00DC009839 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FRANKS, KEVIN · 2012 to 2014
$728k
Synaptic Processes Mediating Cortical Odor CodingK99DC009839 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRANKS, KEVIN · 2009 to 2010
$180k
NIDCD NIH HHS K99 DC009839NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC009839NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to represent both stimulus identity and intensity is fundamental for perception. Using large-scale population recordings in awake mice, we find distinct coding strategies facilitate non-interfering representations of odor identity and intensity in piriform cortex. Simply knowing which neurons were activated is sufficient to accurately represent odor identity, with no additional information about identity provided by spike time or spike count. Decoding analyses indicate that cortical odor representations are not sparse. Odorant concentration had no systematic effect on spike counts, indicating that rate cannot encode intensity. Instead, odor intensity can be encoded by temporal features of the population response. We found a subpopulation of rapid, largely concentration-invariant responses was followed by another population of responses whose latencies systematically decreased at higher concentrations. Cortical inhibition transforms olfactory bulb output to sharpen these dynamics. Our data therefore reveal complementary coding strategies that can selectively represent distinct features of a stimulus.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory PerceptionAction PotentialsAnimalsMiceNeuronsPiriform Cortexmouseneuroscienceodor codingpiriform cortexsensory processing

Identifiers

PMID28379135
PMCPMC5438247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.