Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28379112›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2018

Comparison of two sedation protocols for short electroretinography in cats.

María J Del Sole, Pablo Nejamkin, Verónica Cavilla, Paula Schaiquevich, Laura Moreno

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparisons of α2-Adrenergic Agents, Medetomidine and Xylazine, with Pentobarbital for Anesthesia: Important Pitfalls in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Rats.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  4. Feline procedural sedation and analgesia: When, why and how.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

María J Del Sole1 Laboratory of Pharmacology, Tandil Center of Veterinary Investigation (CIVETAN, CONICET-CICPBA), Faculty of Veterinary Science, National University of the Center of Buenos Aires Province, University Campus, Tandil, Argentina.
Pablo Nejamkin2 Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Science, National University of the Center of Buenos Aires Province, University Campus, Tandil, Argentina.
Verónica Cavilla3 Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, National University of the Center of Buenos Aires Province, University Campus, Tandil, Argentina.
Paula Schaiquevich4 National Council of Scientific and Technical Research, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura Moreno1 Laboratory of Pharmacology, Tandil Center of Veterinary Investigation (CIVETAN, CONICET-CICPBA), Faculty of Veterinary Science, National University of the Center of Buenos Aires Province, University Campus, Tandil, Argentina.
Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires · ARCentro Científico Tecnológico - Tandil · ARGarrahan Hospital · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives The objectives were to compare two different sedative combinations, xylazine-ketamine and dexmedetomidine-ketamine, for the short electroretinography (ERG) protocol and their impact on sedative effect, reversal times and physiological variables in cats. Methods Six healthy spayed female domestic cats were sedated using one of two ketamine-containing protocols: intramuscular xylazine hydrochloride (1 mg/kg) plus ketamine hydrochloride (3 mg/kg) (XK), and dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (5 µg/kg) plus ketamine hydrochloride (3 mg/kg) (DK). A short ERG protocol was recorded from the left eye of each cat under XK and DK sedation. Thirty minutes later, the effects were reversed with yohimbine or atipamezole for the XK and DK treatment, respectively. The cats were evaluated for time to recumbency, time to head elevation, and time to standing position after reversal treatments. Other variables recorded were: systolic blood pressure, cardiac rhythm, heart rate, pulse oximetry and respiratory rate. Recorded ERG variables included a- and b-wave amplitudes and implicit times under photopic, scotopic and scotopic mixed ERG conditions. Results Time to lateral recumbency with XK was shorter than for DK ( P <0.05). After reversal, head elevation and standing position times were significantly longer for the XK than the DK group ( P <0.05). Heart rate increased and systolic blood pressure decreased from baseline in both groups ( P <0.05), but there were no significant differences between treatment groups. The b-wave amplitude recorded in the photopic study of cats treated with XK was lower than in animals treated with DK ( P <0.05). No other significant differences in ERG variables were observed between treatment groups ( P >0.05). Conclusions and relevance The present study shows that XK and DK treatments are chemical restraint alternatives for ERG recording in cats, with significant differences only in the photopic b-wave amplitude.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnimalsCatsDexmedetomidineElectroretinographyFemaleHypnotics and SedativesKetamineXylazineDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineXylazine

Identifiers

PMID28379112
PMCPMC11129254
OpenAlexW2604375653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.