Trial reportBosnian journal of basic medical sciences2017
The role of narrow band imaging in colorectal polyp detection.
Trial report in Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Performance of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy for Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection: A Network Meta-Analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Narrow Band Imaging versus White Light for the Detection of Sessile Serrated Colorectal Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Computer-Aided Image Enhanced Endoscopy Automated System to Boost Polyp and Adenoma Detection Accuracy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Anesthesia Assistance in Colonoscopy: Impact on Quality Indicators.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Diagnostic value of novel retroflexion colonoscopy in the right colon: A randomized controlled trial.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopic detection and removal of polyps represent the most important prevention method for colorectal cancer. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic yield of narrow band imaging (NBI) colonoscopy for polyp detection compared with standard colonoscopy. In this prospective study, 505 patients that underwent total colonoscopy were randomized into two groups: 226 patients in NBI group and 279 in non-NBI group (standard colonoscopy). The primary endpoints were polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) in both groups. Polyps detected with NBI technique were characterized according to the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification. The total number of polyps detected in NBI group was significantly higher compared with non-NBI group (325 polyps in 226 patients versus 189 polyps in 279 patients, respectively). PDR in NBI group was 55.3%, versus 43.3% in non-NBI group. ADR in NBI group was significantly higher compared with non-NBI group (35.3% versus 20%, respectively). The proportion of detected adenomas in the left-sided colon was significantly higher in NBI group (72.8% versus 61.06% in non-NBI group), which was related to an increased number of small adenomas detected in NBI group. Also, in NBI group, a significant number of flat adenomas were detected (28 versus 9 in non-NBI group). A total of 147 (45.2%) polyps were classified according to the NICE classification, and showed a good correlation with histological analysis. In conclusion, this study demonstrated increased PDR and ADR for NBI colonoscopy. A good correlation between the NICE classification and histological analysis was also observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.