Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28378423›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2017

Detecting PKD1 variants in polycystic kidney disease patients by single-molecule long-read sequencing.

Daniel M Borràs, Rolf H A M Vossen, Michael Liem, Henk P J Buermans, Hans Dauwerse, Dave van Heusden, Ron T Gansevoort, Johan T den Dunnen, Bart Janssen, Dorien J M Peters and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Long-read sequencing for brain tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  11. Long-Read Sequencing Identified aHuman mutation · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel M BorràsGenomeScan B.V, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6830-2609
Rolf H A M VossenLeiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michael LiemLeiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Henk P J BuermansLeiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Hans DauwerseDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dave van HeusdenDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ron T GansevoortDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johan T den DunnenLeiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bart JanssenGenomeScan B.V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dorien J M PetersDepartment of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Monique LosekootDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Seyed Yahya AnvarLeiden Genome Technology Center (LGTC), Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLGenomeScan (Netherlands) · NLUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Pilot and FeasibilityP30DK090728 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROMERO, MICHAEL F. · 2010 to 2019
$11.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK090728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A genetic diagnosis of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is challenging due to allelic heterogeneity, high GC content, and homology of the PKD1 gene with six pseudogenes. Short-read next-generation sequencing approaches, such as whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing, often fail at reliably characterizing complex regions such as PKD1. However, long-read single-molecule sequencing has been shown to be an alternative strategy that could overcome PKD1 complexities and discriminate between homologous regions of PKD1 and its pseudogenes. In this study, we present the increased power of resolution for complex regions using long-read sequencing to characterize a cohort of 19 patients with ADPKD. Our approach provided high sensitivity in identifying PKD1 pathogenic variants, diagnosing 94.7% of the patients. We show that reliable screening of ADPKD patients in a single test without interference of PKD1 homologous sequences, commonly introduced by residual amplification of PKD1 pseudogenes, by direct long-read sequencing is now possible. This strategy can be implemented in diagnostics and is highly suitable to sequence and resolve complex genomic regions that are of clinical relevance.

Indexed as

AllelesCohort StudiesGene LibraryGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansLoss of HeterozygosityPolycystic Kidney, Autosomal DominantPolycystic Kidney DiseasesPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePseudogenesSequence Analysis, DNATRPP Cation ChannelsTRPP Cation ChannelsADPKDcomplex genomic regionsDNA diagnosticslong-read sequencingPacBioPKD1single-molecule real-time sequencingvariant detection

Identifiers

PMID28378423
PMCPMC5488171
OpenAlexW2604135607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.