Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28378300›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2018

Development of a Shared Decision Making Model in a Community Mental Health Center.

Shreedhar Paudel, Neeta Sharma, Astha Joshi, Melinda Randall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development and field testing of a decision aid to facilitate shared decision making for adults newly diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shreedhar PaudelDepartment of Psychiatry, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA, USA. paudel4sd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8423-5231
Neeta SharmaDepartment of Psychiatry, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA, USA.
Astha JoshiHealth Foundation Nepal, New York, USA.
Melinda RandallDepartment of Psychiatry, Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA, USA.

Funding

None NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared Decision Making (SDM) is an essential component of recovery oriented treatment for clients with severe and persistent mental illnesses. SDM has been found to be effective in improving outcome of treatment of non-psychiatric ailments, and studies of SDM in community mental health settings are limited. We designed and implemented a low tech SDM program in a non-academic community mental health center and evaluated the outcome on decisional certainty and satisfaction with services. The results suggest that SDM can be effectively integrated with evidence based psychiatric rehabilitation practices utilizing already existing resources.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAgedCommunity Mental Health CentersFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedModels, OrganizationalPatient SatisfactionCommunity mental health centerPsychosocial rehabilitationSevere and persistent mental illnessShared decision making

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.