Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28378204›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2017

A schizophrenia relevant 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task for mice assessing broad monitoring, distractibility and impulsivity.

Huiping Huang, Simone Guadagna, Maddalena Mereu, Mariasole Ciampoli, Giacomo Pruzzo, Theresa Ballard, Francesco Papaleo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Huiping HuangDepartment of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego, 30, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Simone GuadagnaDepartment of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego, 30, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Maddalena MereuDipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Padova, Largo Meneghetti, 2, 35131, Padova, Italy.
Mariasole CiampoliDepartment of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego, 30, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Giacomo PruzzoDepartment of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego, 30, 16163, Genova, Italy.
Theresa BallardNeuroscience, Ophthalmology and Rare Diseases, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.
Francesco PapaleoDepartment of Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, via Morego, 30, 16163, Genova, Italy. francesco.papaleo@iit.it.
Italian Institute of Technology · ITRoche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task (5-CSRTT) is an automated test for rodents allowing the assessment of multiple cognitive measures. Originally designed to assess cognitive deficits relevant to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, it has been widely used in the investigation of neural systems of attention. In the current study, we have set up a modified version, which reduced the training phase to only 8-9 days with minimal food deprivation and without single-housing. Furthermore, based on evidence that patients with schizophrenia are more impaired in broad monitoring abilities than in sustained attention, we successfully developed a protocol replicating the Spatial Attentional Resource Allocation Task (SARAT), used in humans to assess broad monitoring. During this task, when the target appeared at a single pre-cued location, mice selectively responded faster. Instead, increasing the number of validly cued locations proportionately decreased accuracy. We then validated a protocol which is relevant for neuropsychiatric disorders in which additional irrelevant pre-cue lights selectively disrupted attention (distractibility). Finally, we improved previously used protocols changing inter-trial intervals from 5 to 7 s by randomly presenting this shift only in 20% of the trials. This resulted in a selective effect on premature responses (impulsivity), with important implications for schizophrenia as well as for other mental disorders. Therefore, this revised 5-CSRTT reduced training and stress on the animals while selectively measuring different cognitive functions with translational validity to schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChoice BehaviorCognitionCognition DisordersCuesHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMicePsychomotor AgitationReaction TimeSchizophreniaAttentional controlBehaviourCognitionOperant taskSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID28378204
OpenAlexW2604959171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.