Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28378140›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of pediatrics2017

Management of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: ICMR Consensus Document.

Nirav Thacker, Sameer Bakhshi, Girish Chinnaswamy, Tushar Vora, Maya Prasad, Deepak Bansal, Sandeep Agarwala, Gauri Kapoor, Venkatraman Radhakrishnan, Siddharth Laskar and 4 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Efficacy and safety of rituximab in children and adolescents with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a Meta analysis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mediastinal tumours and pseudo-tumours: a comprehensive review with emphasis on multidisciplinary approach.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nirav ThackerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Sameer BakhshiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A Institute-Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Girish ChinnaswamyDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Tushar VoraDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Maya PrasadDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
Deepak BansalPediatric Hematology Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sandeep AgarwalaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Gauri KapoorDepartment of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, Delhi, India.
Venkatraman RadhakrishnanDepartment of Medical Oncology and Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Institute (W.I.A), Adyar, Chennai, India.
Siddharth LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Tanvir KaurNCD Division, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
G K RathDr. B.R.A Institute-Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rupinder Singh DhaliwalNCD Division, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
Brijesh AroraDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India. brijesh.aurora@gmail.com.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INCancer Institute (WIA) · INDR. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INRajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hitherto poor outcomes, paucity of data and heterogeneity in International approach to Pediatric NHL (Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma) prompted the need for guidelines for Indian population with vast variability in access, affordability and infrastructure across the country. These guidelines are based on consensus among the experts and best available evidence applicable to Indian setting. Evaluation of NHL should consist of easily doable and rapid tissue diagnosis (biopsy or flow cytometry of peripheral blood/malignant effusions), St Jude/IPNHLSS (International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Staging System) and risk grouping with CSF (Cerebro-spinal fluid), bone marrow, whole body imaging [CECT (Contrast enhanced computerized tomography) ± MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging)] and blood investigations for LDH (Lactate dehydrogenase), TLS (Tumor lysis syndrome) and organ functions. Life threatening complications like SVCS (Superior vena cava syndrome)/Mediastinal syndrome and TLS need to pre-empted and promptly managed. All children with poor general condition, co-morbidities, metabolic or obstructive complications should receive a steroid or chemotherapy pro-phase first. For mature B-NHL (B cell - Non-Hodgkin lymphoma), in centres with good infrastructure and methotrexate levels, FAB-LMB-96 (French-American-British/Lymphomes Malins B) or BFM (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster)-NHL-95 protocols may be used. In centres with limited infrastructure and/or no methotrexate levels; CHOP (Cyclophosphamide-hydroxydaunomycin-oncovin-prednisolone) (early stage) or MCP (Multi-centre protocol)-842 [all stages except CNS (Central nervous system) disease] may be used. Patients with poor early response should have escalated therapy. High-Risk B-NHL will benefit with addition of Rituximab to standard chemotherapy. Radiotherapy (RT) is not warranted. For lymphoblastic lymphoma, in centres with good infrastructure and methotrexate levels, BFM-95 protocol may be used. In centres with limited infrastructure and/or no methotrexate levels; modified MCP-841 with cytarabine, modified BFM-90 protocol with reduced-dose methotrexate or I-BFM 2009 protocol using Capizzi methotrexate may be considered. For ALCL (Anaplastic large cell lymphoma), in centres with good infrastructure and methotrexate levels, ALCL-99 protocol may be considered. In centres with limited infrastructure and/or no methotrexate levels; CHOP (limited-stage only), modified MCP-842 protocol or APO (Adriamycin-prednisolone-oncovin) regimen may be used.

Indexed as

ChildHumansIndiaLymphoma, Non-HodgkinChildrenIndian guidelinesNon-Hodgkin lymphomaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID28378140
OpenAlexW2602116487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.