Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28378133›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2017

[Palliative therapy concepts in intensive care medicine].

M Schuster, M Ferner, M Bodenstein, R Laufenberg-Feldmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M SchusterKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. michael.schuster@unimedizin-mainz.de.
M FernerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
M BodensteinKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
R Laufenberg-FeldmannKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Involvement of palliative care is so far not common practice for critically ill patients on surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in Germany. The objectives of palliative care concepts are improvement of patient quality of life by relief of disease-related symptoms using an interdisciplinary approach and support of patients and their relatives considering their current physical, psychological, social and spiritual needs. The need for palliative care can be identified via defined screening criteria. Integration of palliative care can either be realized using a consultative model which focusses on involvement of palliative care consultants or an integrative model which embeds palliative care principles into the routine daily practice by the ICU team. Early integration of palliative care in terms of advance care planning (ACP) can lead to an increase in goals of care discussions and quality of life as well as a decrease of mortality and length of stay on the ICU. Moreover, stress reactions of relatives and ICU staff can be reduced and higher satisfaction with therapy can be achieved. The core of goal of care discussions is professional and well-structured communication between patients, relatives and staff. Consideration of palliative care principles by model-based integration into ICU practice can improve complex intensive care courses of disease in a productive but dignified way without neglecting curative attempts.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCritical CareHumansPalliative CareTerminal CareAdvance care planningDecision makingEnd of life goals of carePalliative careSurgical intensive care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.