SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2017
Meta-analysis of effects of ABCB1 polymorphisms on clopidogrel response among patients with coronary artery disease.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacogenomics in the prediction of adverse effects of cardiovascular drugs: the PGx-CardioDrug project.Croatian medical journal · 2026Review
- Association ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Integrative pharmacogenomics analysis predicts the platelet response in clopidogrel treated coronary artery disease (CAD) patients of South India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Personalization of clopidogrel therapy based on genetic polymorphism analysis: clinical implications.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Pharmacogenetics to guide cardiovascular drug therapy.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Biomarkers for Antiplatelet Therapies in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Clinical Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Impact ofPharmacogenomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe substantial variability in the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel has raised major concerns. Molecular epidemiological research suggests that ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism may be associated with clopidogrel response, but results remain controversial. To derive a more precise evaluation of the associations between ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism and the clinical efficacy of clopidogrel, we have conducted a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
methodsThe PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for eligible studies up to 25 October 2016. The odds ratio (OR), the standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to assess the strength of the relationship.
resultsOverall, 28 related studies involving 23,243 patients were analyzed. No association was found between the ABCB1 polymorphisms and the primary outcome. In the subgroup analysis, the C3435T mutation significantly reduced platelet activity as tested by the LTA assay in the dominant (SMD -0.140, 95% CI -0.272 to -0.009, P = 0.036) and heterozygous (SMD -0.154, 95% CI -0.290 to -0.017, P = 0.027) models, but the result lacked robustness in the sensitivity analysis. A significant association between the C3435T polymorphism and bleeding risk was also observed with low heterogeneity in the dominant (OR 1.805, 95% CI1.124-2.900, P =0.015, I
conclusionsThe results of the meta-analysis suggest that ABCB1 C3435T polymorphism may increase the risk of bleeding in Asian patients treated with clopidogrel. The implied relationship needs to be verified in future basic genetic pharmacology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.