Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28378053›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2017

Exome sequence genotype imputation in globally diverse hexaploid wheat accessions.

Fan Shi, Josquin Tibbits, Raj K Pasam, Pippa Kay, Debbie Wong, Joanna Petkowski, Kerrie L Forrest, Ben J Hayes, Alina Akhunova, John Davies and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genotyping by Sequencing Advancements in Barley.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. From markers to genome-based breeding in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Fan ShiAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia. fan.shi@ecodev.vic.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-9017
Josquin TibbitsAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Raj K PasamAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Pippa KayAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Debbie WongAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Joanna PetkowskiAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Kerrie L ForrestAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Ben J HayesAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Alina AkhunovaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
John DaviesDow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Steven WebbDow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
German C SpangenbergAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Eduard AkhunovDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Matthew J HaydenAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Hans D DaetwylerAgriculture Victoria, Agriculture Research Division, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBioscience, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageImputing genotypes from the 90K SNP chip to exome sequence in wheat was moderately accurate. We investigated the factors that affect imputation and propose several strategies to improve accuracy. Imputing genetic marker genotypes from low to high density has been proposed as a cost-effective strategy to increase the power of downstream analyses (e.g. genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction) for a given budget. However, imputation is often imperfect and its accuracy depends on several factors. Here, we investigate the effects of reference population selection algorithms, marker density and imputation algorithms (Beagle4 and FImpute) on the accuracy of imputation from low SNP density (9K array) to the Infinium 90K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array for a collection of 837 hexaploid wheat Watkins landrace accessions. Based on these results, we then used the best performing reference selection and imputation algorithms to investigate imputation from 90K to exome sequence for a collection of 246 globally diverse wheat accessions. Accession-to-nearest-entry and genomic relationship-based methods were the best performing selection algorithms, and FImpute resulted in higher accuracy and was more efficient than Beagle4. The accuracy of imputing exome capture SNPs was comparable to imputing from 9 to 90K at approximately 0.71. This relatively low imputation accuracy is in part due to inconsistency between 90K and exome sequence formats. We also found the accuracy of imputation could be substantially improved to 0.82 when choosing an equivalent number of exome SNP, instead of 90K SNPs on the existing array, as the lower density set. We present a number of recommendations to increase the accuracy of exome imputation.

Indexed as

ExomePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsGenetic MarkersGenomicsGenotypePolyploidyTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.