ArticleApplied clinical informatics2017
Examining Perceptions of Computerized Physician Order Entry in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The burden of the digital environment: a systematic review on organization-directed workplace interventions to mitigate physician burnout.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Charting Tomorrow's Healthcare: A Traditional Literature Review for an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Future.Cureus · 2024Review
- Reducing Pediatric Emergency Department Prescription Errors.Pediatrics · 2022Article
- Clinician Acceptance of Order Sets for Pain Management: A Survey in Two Urban Hospitals.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Article
- Impact of Patient Census and Admission Mortality on Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Attending Electronic Health Record Activity: A Preliminary Study.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
- Effect of Organization-Directed Workplace Interventions on Physician Burnout: A Systematic Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2019Review
- Computerized Physician Order Entry in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Narrative Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Review
- Proposed model to determine satisfaction with computerised provider order entry systems in a long-stay hospital.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputerized provider order entry (CPOE) is a technology with potential to transform care delivery. While CPOE systems have been studied in adult populations, less is known about the implementation of CPOE in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and perceptions of nurses and physicians using the system.
objectiveTo examine perceptions of clinicians before and after CPOE implementation in the NICU of a pediatric hospital.
methodsA cross-sectional survey of clinicians working in a Level III NICU was conducted. The survey was distributed before and after CPOE implementation. Participants were asked about their perception of CPOE on patient care delivery, implementation of the system, and effect on job satisfaction. A qualitative section inquired about additional concerns surrounding implementation. Responses were tabulated and analyzed using the Chi-square test.
resultsThe survey was distributed to 158 clinicians with a 47% response rate for pre-implementation and 45% for post-implementation. Clinicians understood why CPOE was implemented, but felt there was incomplete technical training. The expectation for increased job satisfaction and ability to recruit high-quality staff was high. However, there was concern about the ability to deliver appropriate treatments before and after implementation. Physicians were more optimistic about CPOE implementation than nurses who remained concerned that workflow may be altered.
conclusionsIntroducing CPOE is a potentially risky endeavor and must be done carefully to mitigate harm. Although high expectations of the system can be met, it is important to attend to differing expectations among clinicians with varied levels of comfort with technology. Interdisciplinary collaboration is critical in planning a functioning CPOE to ensure that efficient workflow is maintained and appropriate supports for individuals with a lower degree of technical literacy is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.