ArticleUrology case reports2017
A Case Report of Priapism With Unusual Presentation and Clinical Course.
Article in Urology case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Original Mouse Models of Glioblastoma: Analysis of Pathophysiological Characteristics of Transplanted Tumor Tissue.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2025Article
- Priapism due to chronic myelocytic leukemia.Urology case reports · 2022Article
- Establishment of mouse line showing inducible priapism-like phenotypes.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This is a case report on a patient with an unusual presentation and clinical course of priapism. It further discusses treatment options with reflection on current literatures and guidelines. 48 year old patient presented with a history of more than 50 episodes of priapism, each lasting for five minutes. Patient had history of brain tumor that was resected and had since been in remission. On examination and further biochemistry assessment revealed conflicting clinical findings, making it difficult to ascertain the type of priapism in this case. The patient, however, recovered from the acute attacks of priapism after 24 hours of conservative management and no obvious cause had been identified on post-discharge follow-up. Priapism, despite being rare, is a medical emergency. This case report reflected upon the limitations of treatment guidelines and the lack of level one evidence to support treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.