ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017
Species Delimitation and Lineage Separation History of a Species Complex of Aspens in China.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling complex relationships and disjunctions in western Camassia: Integrating multiple criteria to resolve taxonomic boundaries.American journal of botany · 2025Article
- Across two phylogeographic breaks: Quaternary evolutionary history of a mountain aspen (Plant diversity · 2024Article
- Species Delimitation and Genetic Relationship ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Phylogeography ofForestry research · 2023Article
- Patterns of Species Richness and Distribution of the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Warps and Wefts of a Polyploidy Complex: Integrative Species Delimitation of the DiploidPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genetic diversity and population dynamic ofEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Genomic Differentiation and Demographic Histories of Two Closely Related Salicaceae Species.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Integrating morphological and genetic limits in the taxonomic delimitation of the Cuban taxa of Magnoliasubsect.Talauma (Magnoliaceae).PhytoKeys · 2022Article
- Species boundaries in the messy middle-A genome-scale validation of species delimitation in a recently diverged lineage of coastal fog desert lichen fungi.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Evolution of strong reproductive isolation in plants: broad-scale patterns and lessons from a perennial model group.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020Article
- The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020Article
- Article
- Phylogeographic analyses of a widely distributedEcology and evolution · 2018Article
- Strong population bottleneck and repeated demographic expansions of Populus adenopoda (Salicaceae) in subtropical China.Annals of botany · 2018Article
- Radiation of members of thePhytoKeys · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species delimitation in tree species is notoriously challenging due to shared polymorphisms among species. An integrative survey that considers multiple operational criteria is a possible solution, and we aimed to test it in a species complex of aspens in China. Genetic [four chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) fragments and 14 nuclear microsatellite loci (nSSR)] and morphological variations were collected for 76 populations and 53 populations, respectively, covering the major geographic distribution of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.