Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28377708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2017

Increased Evoked Potentials to Arousing Auditory Stimuli during Sleep: Implication for the Understanding of Dream Recall.

Raphael Vallat, Tarek Lajnef, Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub, Christian Berthomier, Karim Jerbi, Dominique Morlet, Perrine M Ruby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Poor dream recall associates with Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and dementia risk.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. A dream EEG and mentation database.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dreams, Sleep, and Psychotropic Drugs.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Cortical activation during sleep predicts dream experience in narcolepsy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raphael VallatBrain Dynamics and Cognition Team-Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bat. 452)Bron, France; Lyon 1 UniversityLyon, France.
Tarek LajnefLETI Lab, Sfax National Engineering School, University of SfaxSfax, Tunisia; Department of Psychology, Université de MontréalMontréal, QC, Canada.
Jean-Baptiste EichenlaubDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Christian BerthomierPhysip Paris, France.
Karim JerbiBrain Dynamics and Cognition Team-Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bat. 452)Bron, France; Department of Psychology, Université de MontréalMontréal, QC, Canada.
Dominique MorletBrain Dynamics and Cognition Team-Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bat. 452)Bron, France; Lyon 1 UniversityLyon, France.
Perrine M RubyBrain Dynamics and Cognition Team-Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR 5292, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (Bat. 452)Bron, France; Lyon 1 UniversityLyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High dream recallers (HR) show a larger brain reactivity to auditory stimuli during wakefulness and sleep as compared to low dream recallers (LR) and also more intra-sleep wakefulness (ISW), but no other modification of the sleep macrostructure. To further understand the possible causal link between brain responses, ISW and dream recall, we investigated the sleep microstructure of HR and LR, and tested whether the amplitude of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) was predictive of arousing reactions during sleep. Participants (18 HR, 18 LR) were presented with sounds during a whole night of sleep in the lab and polysomnographic data were recorded. Sleep microstructure (arousals, rapid eye movements (REMs), muscle twitches (MTs), spindles, KCs) was assessed using visual, semi-automatic and automatic validated methods. AEPs to arousing (awakenings or arousals) and non-arousing stimuli were subsequently computed. No between-group difference in the microstructure of sleep was found. In N2 sleep, auditory arousing stimuli elicited a larger parieto-occipital positivity and an increased late frontal negativity as compared to non-arousing stimuli. As compared to LR, HR showed more arousing stimuli and more long awakenings, regardless of the sleep stage but did not show more numerous or longer arousals. These results suggest that the amplitude of the brain response to stimuli during sleep determine subsequent awakening and that awakening duration (and not arousal) is the critical parameter for dream recall. Notably, our results led us to propose that the minimum necessary duration of an awakening during sleep for a successful encoding of dreams into long-term memory is approximately 2 min.

Indexed as

arousalsawakeningsdreamingEEGoddball paradigmsleep

Identifiers

PMID28377708
PMCPMC5360011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.