ArticleScientific reports2017
A safety study of high concentration and high frequency intravitreal injection of conbercept in rabbits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in the study of Conbercept for diabetic macular edema.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Review
- Preclinical Efficacy and Safety of VEGF-Grab, a Novel Anti-VEGF Drug, and Its Comparison to Aflibercept.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- CD4The American journal of pathology · 2020Article
- Proteomic analysis of anti-angiogenic effects by conbercept in the mice with oxygen induced retinopathy.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Difference in the Vitreal Protein Profiles of Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy with and without Intravitreal Conbercept Injection.Journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Safety of Intravitreal Injection of Stivant, a Biosimilar to Bevacizumab, in Rabbit Eyes.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The novel anti-VEGF drug conbercept has been used in the treatment of several retinal neovascular diseases. Owning to the alteration of the structure, the newest drug is capable of combining more molecular targets and present higher affinity to the angiogenesis promoting factors. However, it is unknown whether it will cause any unwanted effects like other anti-VEGF agents. We studied the short-term safety of high concentration and high frequency intravitreal injection of conbercept in rabbits. Intraocular pressure, fundus-photography, ERGs were applied. Retinal morphology, the amount of apoptotic cells and protein levels of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α in the aqueous humor were determined. Retinal proteomics was detected using tandem mass tags (TMTs) quantitative mass spectrometry. The difference of IOP, ERGs, protein levels of inflammatory factors among rabbits received conbercept and PBS was not significant (P > 0.05). Fundus photographs and retinal morphology of animals in the conbercept-injected groups mimic those observed in the PBS-injected groups. No TUNEL-positive cell was seen in the retinal ganglion cell layer in the conbercept-injected groups. Proteomics did not show significant changes of inflammation or apoptosis associated proteins in the conbercept-injected eyes. We conclude that intravitreal injection of high concentration and high frequency conbercept is well tolerated at least in a short-term in rabbits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.