Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28377514›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

SMARCE1 is required for the invasive progression of in situ cancers.

Ethan S Sokol, Yu-Xiong Feng, Dexter X Jin, Minu D Tizabi, Daniel H Miller, Malkiel A Cohen, Sandhya Sanduja, Ferenc Reinhardt, Jai Pandey, Daphne A Superville and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Targeting and monitoring ovarian cancer invasion with an RNAi and peptide delivery system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ethan S SokolWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Yu-Xiong FengWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Dexter X JinWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Minu D TizabiWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Daniel H MillerWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Malkiel A CohenWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Sandhya SandujaWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Ferenc ReinhardtWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Jai PandeyWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Daphne A SupervilleWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142.
Rudolf JaenischWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142; jaenisch@wi.mit.edu piyush@mit.edu.
Piyush B GuptaWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142; jaenisch@wi.mit.edu piyush@mit.edu.
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

PRE-DOCTORAL TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007287 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BELL, STEPHEN P., KEATING, AMY E · 1985 to 2019
$40.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in mammography have sparked an exponential increase in the detection of early-stage breast lesions, most commonly ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). More than 50% of DCIS lesions are benign and will remain indolent, never progressing to invasive cancers. However, the factors that promote DCIS invasion remain poorly understood. Here, we show that SMARCE1 is required for the invasive progression of DCIS and other early-stage tumors. We show that SMARCE1 drives invasion by regulating the expression of secreted proteases that degrade basement membrane, an ECM barrier surrounding all epithelial tissues. In functional studies, SMARCE1 promotes invasion of in situ cancers growing within primary human mammary tissues and is also required for metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, SMARCE1 drives invasion by forming a SWI/SNF-independent complex with the transcription factor ILF3. In patients diagnosed with early-stage cancers, SMARCE1 expression is a strong predictor of eventual relapse and metastasis. Collectively, these findings establish SMARCE1 as a key driver of invasive progression in early-stage tumors.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsApoptosisBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell ProliferationChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDisease ProgressionDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNeoplasm InvasivenessChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA-Binding ProteinsSMARCE1 protein, humanbiomarkerDCISinvasive progressionSMARCE1

Identifiers

PMID28377514
PMCPMC5402464
OpenAlexW2605225872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.