Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28377509›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2017

Genetic tracing of hepatocytes in liver homeostasis, injury, and regeneration.

Yue Wang, XiuZhen Huang, Lingjuan He, Wenjuan Pu, Yan Li, Qiaozhen Liu, Yi Li, Libo Zhang, Wei Yu, Huan Zhao and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fetal liver development and implications for liver disease pathogenesis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cellular origins of regenerating liver and hepatocellular carcinoma.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2022
    Review
  10. In Vivo Methods to Monitor Cardiomyocyte Proliferation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Efficient photoactivatable Dre recombinase for cell type-specific spatiotemporal control of genome engineering in the mouse.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Liver Regeneration after Hepatectomy and Partial Liver Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Lgr5Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The many ways to mend your liver: A critical appraisal.International journal of experimental pathology · 2018
    Review
  19. Hepatic Regeneration in Cirrhosis.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yue WangFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
XiuZhen HuangFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Lingjuan HeFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Wenjuan PuFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Yan LiFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Qiaozhen LiuFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Yi LiFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Libo ZhangFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Wei YuFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Huan ZhaoFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China.
Yingqun Zhouthe Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China, yqzh02@163.com.
Bin ZhouFrom The State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China, zhoubin@sibs.ac.cn.
Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNShanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver possesses a remarkable capacity to regenerate after damage. There is a heated debate on the origin of new hepatocytes after injuries in adult liver. Hepatic stem/progenitor cells have been proposed to produce functional hepatocytes after injury. Recent studies have argued against this model and suggested that pre-existing hepatocytes, rather than stem cells, contribute new hepatocytes. This hepatocyte-to-hepatocyte model is mainly based on labeling of hepatocytes with Cre-recombinase delivered by the adeno-associated virus. However, the impact of virus infection on cell fate determination, consistency of infection efficiency, and duration of Cre-virus in hepatocytes remain confounding factors that interfere with the data interpretation. Here, we generated a new genetic tool

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationHepatocytesLiverLiver RegenerationStem CellsAnimalsCell TrackingIntegrasesMiceMice, TransgenicCre recombinaseIntegrasescell differentiationhepatocytelineage traceliver injurymouse geneticsprogenitor cellregenerationreplenish

Identifiers

PMID28377509
PMCPMC5448089
OpenAlexW2604424272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.