Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28377158›Full record

ArticleBrain research2017

Task difficulty modulates brain activation in the emotional oddball task.

Rachel E Siciliano, David J Madden, Catherine W Tallman, Maria A Boylan, Imke Kirste, Zachary A Monge, Lauren E Packard, Guy G Potter, Lihong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel E SicilianoBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
David J MaddenBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: david.madden@duke.edu.
Catherine W TallmanBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Maria A BoylanBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Imke KirsteBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Zachary A MongeCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Lauren E PackardBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Guy G PotterBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Lihong WangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, United States.

Funding

Neuroimaging of Visual Attention in AgingR01AG039684 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, DAVID J. · 2011 to 2022
$5.0M
Dorsal Cingulate Activity and Cognitive Decline in Late-Life DepressionR01MH098301 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, DAVID J., WANG, LIHONG · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039684NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have reported that task-irrelevant, emotionally salient events can disrupt target discrimination, particularly when attentional demands are low, while others demonstrate alterations in the distracting effects of emotion in behavior and neural activation in the context of attention-demanding tasks. We used fMRI, in conjunction with an emotional oddball task, at different levels of target discrimination difficulty, to investigate the effects of emotional distractors on the detection of subsequent targets. In addition, we distinguished different behavioral components of target detection representing decisional, nondecisional, and response criterion processes. Results indicated that increasing target discrimination difficulty led to increased time required for both the decisional and nondecisional components of the detection response, as well as to increased target-related neural activation in frontoparietal regions. The emotional distractors were associated with activation in ventral occipital and frontal regions and dorsal frontal regions, but this activation was attenuated with increased difficulty. Emotional distraction did not alter the behavioral measures of target detection, but did lead to increased target-related frontoparietal activation for targets following emotional images as compared to those following neutral images. This latter effect varied with target discrimination difficulty, with an increased influence of the emotional distractors on subsequent target-related frontoparietal activation in the more difficult discrimination condition. This influence of emotional distraction was in addition associated specifically with the decisional component of target detection. These findings indicate that emotion-cognition interactions, in the emotional oddball task, vary depending on the difficulty of the target discrimination and the associated limitations on processing resources.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAttentionAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingDecision MakingDiscrimination, PsychologicalEmotionsFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobeAttentionCognitive controlDistractionEmotionfMRITask difficulty

Identifiers

PMID28377158
PMCPMC5452685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.