Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376974›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health behavior2017

Impact of Health Literacy-directed Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Instruction Sheet.

Terry C Davis, Jill Hancock, James Morris, Perry Branim, Abhishek Seth, Alfred Rademaker, Connie L Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Indigenizing and Ruralizing NCI Screen to Save Program: Resources, Optimizing Outreach, Teaching, Science (ROOTS).Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  4. Healthcare Disparities and Colorectal Cancer.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A Scoping Review on How to Make Hospitals health Literate Healthcare Organizations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Terry C DavisProfessor, Department of Medicine and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA.
Jill HancockResearch Associate, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA.
James MorrisAssistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA.
Perry BranimNurse Manager, Gastroenterology Clinic, University Health, Shreveport, LA.
Abhishek SethClinical Fellow, Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA.
Alfred RademakerProfessor, Department of Preventive Medicine and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Connie L ArnoldAssociate Professor, Department of Medicine and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA;, Email: carnol@lsuhsc.edu.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo improve patient colonoscopy bowel preparation with a newly developed simplified instruction sheet in a safety-net hospital system.

methodsBowel preparation quality was compared in a retrospective chart review of 543 patients, 287 of whom received standard instructions (9th grade reading level) between November 2015 and February 2016, and 256 of whom received simplified instructions (6th grade level) between March and May 2016. Instructions were mailed to all patients. The primary outcome was bowel preparation quality recorded by the endoscopist as optimal or suboptimal preparation.

results543 medical records were reviewed and results indicated a significant association between the instructions used and preparation quality with patients receiving simplified instructions being significantly more prepared (69.1% vs 65.5%) and having a lower cancellation rate (4.7% vs 10.5%), p = .042.

conclusionsA no-cost simplified colonoscopy instruction sheet improved bowel preparation among patients in an academic safety-net health system.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyHealth LiteracyPatient ComplianceTeachingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28376974
PMCPMC8590586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.