Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376912›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Head-to-head comparison of aggressive conventional therapy and three biological treatments and comparison of two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to treatment: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded-assessor, phase 4 study.

Daniel Glinatsi, Marte S Heiberg, Anna Rudin, Dan Nordström, Espen A Haavardsholm, Bjorn Gudbjornsson, Mikkel Østergaard, Till Uhlig, Gerdur Grondal, Kim Hørslev-Petersen and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01491815 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-assessor, Phase 4 Study in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis to Compare Active Conventional Therapy Versus Three Biologic Treatments, and Two De-escalation Strategies in Patients Who Respond to Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2012 to 2023Enrolled812ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsNon-biological DMARD's, Cimzia, Orencia, RoActemra
NCT02466581 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-assessor, Follow-up, Phase 4 Study in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have Completed the Initial Treatment Part in the NORD-STAR Study and Have Reached Stable Low Disease Activity

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2015 to 2023Enrolled25ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsSulphasalazine + Hydroxychloroquine OR Prednisolone, Cimzia, Orencia, RoActemra
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Transitional and CD21BMC rheumatology · 2025
    Article
  12. Circulating Baseline CXCR3ACR open rheumatology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanotherapeutic-directed approaches to analgesia.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Recent advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Daniel GlinatsiCopenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Nordre Ringvej 57, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark. daniel.glinatsi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0452-8200
Marte S HeibergDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23 Vinderen, 0219, Oslo, Norway.
Anna RudinClinical Rheumatology Research Centre, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gröna Stråket 14, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dan NordströmHelsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Division of Internal Medicine, Stenbäcksgatan 9 A, FIN-00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Espen A HaavardsholmDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23 Vinderen, 0219, Oslo, Norway.
Bjorn GudbjornssonCentre for Rheumatology Research, University Hospital, v/Hringbraut, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Mikkel ØstergaardCopenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Nordre Ringvej 57, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Till UhligNational Advisory Unit for Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Box 23 Vinderen, 0319, Oslo, Norway.
Gerdur GrondalDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Fossvogur, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Kim Hørslev-PetersenDepartment of Rheumatology, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Toldbodgade 3, 6300, Graasten, Denmark.
Ronald van VollenhovenUnit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases, The Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Merete L HetlandCopenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Nordre Ringvej 57, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark.
Diakonhjemmet Hospital · NOReykjavík University · ISUniversity of Copenhagen · DKGlostrup Hospital · DKKarolinska Institutet · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew targeted therapies and improved treatment strategies have dramatically improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, it is unknown whether different early aggressive interventions can induce stable remission or a low-active disease state that can be maintained with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD) therapy, and whether they differ in efficacy and safety. The Nordic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) study will assess and compare (1) the proportion of patients who achieve remission in a head-to-head comparison between csDMARD plus glucocorticoid therapy and three different biological DMARD (bDMARD) therapies with different modes of action and (2) two de-escalation strategies in patients who respond to first-line therapy. METHODS/

designIn a pragmatic, 80-160-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, phase 4 study, 800 patients with early RA (symptom duration less than 24 months) are randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four different treatment arms: (1) aggressive csDMARD therapy with methotrexate + sulphasalazine + hydroxychloroquine + i.a. glucocorticoids (arm 1A) or methotrexate + prednisolone p.o. (arm 1B), (2) methotrexate + certolizumab-pegol, (3) methotrexate + abatacept, or (4) methotrexate + tocilizumab. The primary clinical endpoint is the proportion of patients reaching Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at week 24. Patients in stable remission over 24 consecutive weeks enter part 2 of the study earliest after 48 weeks. Patients not achieving sustained CDAI remission over 24 consecutive weeks, exit the study after 80 weeks. In part 2, patients are re-randomized to two different de-escalation strategies, either immediate or delayed (after 24 weeks) tapering, followed by cessation of study medication. All patients remain on stable doses of methotrexate. The primary clinical endpoint in part 2 is the proportion of patients in remission (CDAI ≤2.8) 24 weeks after initiating treatment de-escalation. Radiographic assessment will be performed regularly throughout the trial, and blood and urine samples will be stored in a biobank for later biomarker analyses. DISCUSSION: NORD-STAR is the first investigator-initiated, randomized, early RA trial to compare (1) csDMARD and three different bDMARD therapies head to head and (2) two different de-escalation strategies. The trial has the potential to identify which treatment strategy to apply in early RA to achieve the best possible outcomes for both patients and society.

trial registrationNCT01491815 and NCT02466581 . Registered on 8 December 2011 and May 2015, respectively. EudraCT: 2011-004720-35.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsBiomarkersClinical ProtocolsDrug Therapy, CombinationGlucocorticoidsHumansRegistriesRemission InductionResearch DesignScandinavian and Nordic CountriesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsBiomarkersGlucocorticoidsAggressive conventional treatmentBiological treatmentDe-escalation strategyEarly treatmentRheumatoid arthritisSustained remission

Identifiers

PMID28376912
PMCPMC5381054
OpenAlexW2605001750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.