Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376892›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2017

Measuring implementation behaviour of menu guidelines in the childcare setting: confirmatory factor analysis of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire (TDFQ).

Kirsty Seward, Luke Wolfenden, John Wiggers, Meghan Finch, Rebecca Wyse, Christopher Oldmeadow, Justin Presseau, Tara Clinton-McHarg, Sze Lin Yoong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03938103 (A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial of Go NAPSACC), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03938103 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial of Go NAPSACC: A Childcare-based Obesity Prevention Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2019 to 2022Enrolled364ConditionsObesityArmsEnhanced Go NAPSACC, Basic Go NAPSACC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kirsty SewardHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia. Kirsty.seward@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
John WiggersHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Meghan FinchHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Rebecca WyseHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Christopher OldmeadowPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Justin PresseauOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Tara Clinton-McHargHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Sze Lin YoongHunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile there are number of frameworks which focus on supporting the implementation of evidence based approaches, few psychometrically valid measures exist to assess constructs within these frameworks. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically assess a scale measuring each domain of the Theoretical Domains Framework for use in assessing the implementation of dietary guidelines within a non-health care setting (childcare services).

methodsA 75 item 14-domain Theoretical Domains Framework Questionnaire (TDFQ) was developed and administered via telephone interview to 202 centre based childcare service cooks who had a role in planning the service menu. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was undertaken to assess the reliability, discriminant validity and goodness of fit of the 14-domain theoretical domain framework measure.

resultsFor the CFA, five iterative processes of adjustment were undertaken where 14 items were removed, resulting in a final measure consisting of 14 domains and 61 items. For the final measure: the Chi-Square goodness of fit statistic was 3447.19; the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) was 0.070; the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.072; and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) had a value of 0.78.

conclusionsWhile only one of the three indices support goodness of fit of the measurement model tested, a 14-domain model with 61 items showed good discriminant validity and internally consistent items. Future research should aim to assess the psychometric properties of the developed TDFQ in other community-based settings.

Indexed as

Child CareChild Day Care CentersDietGuideline AdherenceMenu PlanningNutrition PolicyChildChild HealthFactor Analysis, StatisticalFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsChildcareGuidelinesImplementationPsychometric propertiesTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID28376892
PMCPMC5381057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.