Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376891›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2017

Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial.

Gary Alcock, Helen G Liley, Lucy Cooke, Peter H Gray

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Late-onset sepsis in very preterm infants in Norway in 2009-2018: a population-based study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2023
    Article
  5. Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis: A Review Article.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gary AlcockNewborn Services, Mater Mothers' Hospital, Raymond Tce, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Helen G LileyNewborn Services, Mater Mothers' Hospital, Raymond Tce, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Lucy CookeNewborn Services, Mater Mothers' Hospital, Raymond Tce, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Peter H GrayNewborn Services, Mater Mothers' Hospital, Raymond Tce, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. Peter.Gray@mater.org.au.
Mater Mothers' Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLate-onset sepsis (LOS), defined as sepsis occurring after 48 h of age causes substantial mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Risk factors for LOS include immaturity, intravascular catheters, mechanical ventilation, and prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN). Little attention has been paid to studying the effects of PN administration methods. The aim of the study was to compare a bundle of measures for PN line management incorporating a strict aseptic technique with standard line management on LOS in very low birth weight infants.

methodsInfants <1500 g birth weight who required PN were randomised to either a bundle of a strict aseptic technique for line management together with single use intravascular catheter for PN or a standard technique. The primary outcome was the incidence of LOS in the first 28 days of life. Secondary outcomes were mortality, neonatal morbidities and developmental outcome at 12 months of age.

resultsThere were 126 infants in the aseptic technique group and 123 in the standard technique group. Forty (31.8%) infants in the aseptic technique group and 36 (29.3%) in the standard technique group had an episode of sepsis (p = 0.77). This corresponds to incidences of 15.8 and 14.2 episodes of sepsis per 1000 patient days respectively. Subgroup analyses for infants <1000 g also revealed no difference in the rate of sepsis between the intervention and control groups. (p = 0.43). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes and development between the groups.

conclusionA bundle of measures including strict aseptic technique for parenteral nutrition line management did not result in a reduction in LOS when compared to a standard technique. There is no evidence to recommend this as routine practice.

trial registrationInterdisciplinary Maternal Perinatal Australasian Collaborative Trials (IMPACT) Network, TRN registration number: PT0363. Date: 06/03/2001; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), TRN registration number: ACTRN12617000455369 . Date: 28/03/2017 (retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightCatheter-Related InfectionsChild DevelopmentCross InfectionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleNeonatal SepsisParenteral NutritionProspective StudiesCatheter associated infectionsLate-onset sepsisParenteral nutritionPreterm

Identifiers

PMID28376891
PMCPMC5381090
OpenAlexW2604198543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.