Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376797›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2017

Impact of diabetes on outcome in critical limb ischemia with tissue loss: a large-scaled routine data analysis.

Eva Freisinger, Nasser M Malyar, Holger Reinecke, Holger Lawall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva FreisingerDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany. eva.freisinger@ukmuenster.de.
Nasser M MalyarDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Holger ReineckeDivision of Vascular Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, A1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Holger LawallPraxis für Herzkreislauferkrankungen und Akademie für Gefaeßkrankheiten, Ettlingen, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with diabetes concomitant to critical limb ischemia (CLI) represent a sub-group at particular risk. Objective of this analysis is to evaluate the actual impact of diabetes on treatment, outcome, and costs in a real-world scenario in Germany.

methodsWe obtained routine-data on 15,332 patients with CLI with tissue loss from the largest German health insurance, BARMER GEK from 2009 to 2011, including a follow-up until 2013. Patient data were analyzed regarding co-diagnosis with diabetes with respect to risk profiles, treatment strategy, in-hospital and long-term outcome including costs.

resultsDiabetic patients received less overall revascularizations in Rutherford grades 5 and 6 (Rutherford grade 5: 45.0 vs. 55.5%; Rutherford grade 6: 46.5 vs. 51.8; p < 0.001) and less vascular surgery (Rutherford grade 5: 13.4 vs. 23.4; Rutherford grade 6: 19.7 vs. 29.6; p < 0.001), however more often endovascular revascularization in Rutherford grade 6 (31.0 vs. 28.1; p = 0.004) compared to non-diabetic patients. Diabetes was associated with a higher observed ratio of infections (35.3 vs. 23.5% Rutherford grade 5; 44.3 vs. 27.4% Rutherford grade 6; p < 0.001) and in-hospital amputations (13.0 vs. 7.3% Rutherford grade 5; 47.5 vs. 36.7% Ruth6; p < 0.001). Diabetes further increased the risk for amputation during follow-up [Rutherford grade 5: HR 1.51 (1.38-1.67); Rutherford grade 6: HR 1.33 (1.25-1.41); p < 0.001], but not for death.

conclusionsDiabetes increases markedly the risk of amputation attended by higher costs in CLI patients with tissue loss (OR 1.67 at Rutherford 5, OR 1.53 at Rutherford 6; p < 0.001), but is associated with lower revascularizations. However, in Rutherford grades 5 and 6, concomitant diabetes does not further worsen the overall poor survival.

Indexed as

Statistics as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalDiabetes MellitusFollow-Up StudiesHumansIschemiaLegLimb SalvageMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseaseRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVascular Surgical ProceduresCritical limb ischemiaDiabetesEpidemiologyOutcomeRoutine-data analysis

Identifiers

PMID28376797
PMCPMC5379505
OpenAlexW2605122332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.