ReviewBMC medical informatics and decision making2017
Patients' support for health information exchange: a literature review and classification of key factors.
Review in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Perceptions of Blockchain-Based Health Information Exchange: User-Centered Design Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Doctor performance drivers: insights from various theoretical perspectives.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Acceptability of patient-centered digital vaccine safety monitoring: A Canadian Immunization Research Network study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Health Information Behavior in Parents of Children With Congenital Heart Disease in China: Qualitative Study Through the Lens of Chinese Culture.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Determinants of consent for electronic health information exchange: an observational retrospective study.Health research policy and systems · 2025Observational
- Acceptability, benefits and barriers of electronic health record radiology image sharing: A mixed-method study.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Article
- Consent mechanisms and default effects in health information exchange in Japan.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Collection and sharing of health information in mental health and related systems in Australia: perspectives of people who access mental health services.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Stakeholders' perceptions of personal health data sharing: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Review
- Acceptability of Dyad Care Management After Preterm Birth: A Qualitative Study.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- Role of Incentives in the Use of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Sharing Sensitive Health Data: Experimental Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Evolution of Health Information Sharing Between Health Care Organizations: Potential of Nonfungible Tokens.Interactive journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Mechanism Design of Health Care Blockchain System Token Economy: Development Study Based on Simulated Real-World Scenarios.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Leadership Perspectives on Implementing Health Information Exchange: Qualitative Study in a Tertiary Veterans Affairs Medical Center.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- "It's way more than just writing a prescription": A qualitative study of preferences for integrated versus non-integrated treatment models among individuals with opioid use disorder.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2021Article
- Definitions, components and processes of data harmonisation in healthcare: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- In Defence of informed consent for health record research - why arguments from 'easy rescue', 'no harm' and 'consent bias' fail.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Racial differences in patient consent policy preferences for electronic health information exchange.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLiterature indicates that one of the most important factors affecting the widespread adoption of Health Information Exchange (HIE) is patient support and endorsement. In order to reap all the expected benefits of HIE, patients' acceptance of technology is a challenge that is not fully studied. There are a few studies which have focused on requirements of electronic medical information exchange from consumers' views and expectations. This study is aimed at reviewing the literature to articulate factors that affect patients to support HIE efforts.
methodsA literature review of current studies addressing patients' views on HIE from 2005 was undertaken. Five electronic research databases (Science Direct, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premiere) were searched to retrieve articles reporting pros and cons of HIE from patients' opinion.
resultsOne hundred and ninety six articles were initially retrieved from the databases. Out of 196, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria and were fully reviewed. Our findings indicate that patient's attitude toward HIE is affected by seven main factors: perceived benefits, perceived concerns, patient characteristics, patient participation level in HIE, type of health information, identity of recipients, and patient preferences regarding consent and features.
conclusionsThe findings provide useful theoretical implications for research by developing a classification of significant factors and a framework based on the lessons learned from the literature to help guide HIE efforts. Our results also have fundamental practical implications for policy makers, current and potential organizers of HIEs by highlighting the role of patients in the widespread implementation of HIE. The study indicates that new approaches should be applied to completely underline HIE benefits for patients and also address their concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.