ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2017
Fossils matter: improved estimates of divergence times in Pinus reveal older diversification.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why conserve genetic diversity? A perspective based on a case study with a European conifer.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Exploring Pinus nigra's induced defense arsenal against Diplodia sapinea through gene and metabolic pathway analysis.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Widespread slow growth of acquisitive tree species.Nature · 2025Article
- New insights on angiosperm crown age based on Bayesian node dating and skyline fossilized birth-death approaches.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Molecular time estimates for the Lagomorpha diversification.PloS one · 2024Article
- Impacts of Taxon-Sampling Schemes on Bayesian Tip Dating Under the Fossilized Birth-Death Process.Systematic biology · 2023Article
- Insights into phylogenetic relationships in Pinus inferred from a comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Changes in demography and geographic distribution in the weeping pinyon pine (Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Beetle bioluminescence outshines extant aerial predators.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Evolutionarily conserved odorant-binding proteins participate in establishing tritrophic interactions.iScience · 2022Article
- Speciation and population divergence in a mutualistic seed dispersing bird.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Understanding flammability and bark thickness in the genus Pinus using a phylogenetic approach.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Tree functional traits, forest biomass, and tree species diversity interact with site properties to drive forest soil carbon.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Lack of Phylogenetic Differences in Ectomycorrhizal Fungi among Distinct Mediterranean Pine Forest Habitats.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Evolutionary history of the mediterranean Pinus halepensis-brutia species complex using gene-resequencing and transcriptomic approaches.Plant molecular biology · 2021Article
- Phylogenomic and ecological analyses reveal the spatiotemporal evolution of global pines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Sareomycetes: more diverse than meets the eye.IMA fungus · 2021Article
- Mind the Outgroup and Bare Branches in Total-Evidence Dating: a Case Study of Pimpliform Darwin Wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).Systematic biology · 2021Article
- Molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal a deep dichotomy in the conifer-inhabiting genus Trisetacus (Eriophyoidea: Nalepellidae), with the two lineages differing in their female genital morphology and host associations.Experimental & applied acarology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe taxonomy of pines (genus Pinus) is widely accepted and a robust gene tree based on entire plastome sequences exists. However, there is a large discrepancy in estimated divergence times of major pine clades among existing studies, mainly due to differences in fossil placement and dating methods used. We currently lack a dated molecular phylogeny that makes use of the rich pine fossil record, and this study is the first to estimate the divergence dates of pines based on a large number of fossils (21) evenly distributed across all major clades, in combination with applying both node and tip dating methods.
resultsWe present a range of molecular phylogenetic trees of Pinus generated within a Bayesian framework. We find the origin of crown Pinus is likely up to 30 Myr older (Early Cretaceous) than inferred in most previous studies (Late Cretaceous) and propose generally older divergence times for major clades within Pinus than previously thought. Our age estimates vary significantly between the different dating approaches, but the results generally agree on older divergence times. We present a revised list of 21 fossils that are suitable to use in dating or comparative analyses of pines.
conclusionsReliable estimates of divergence times in pines are essential if we are to link diversification processes and functional adaptation of this genus to geological events or to changing climates. In addition to older divergence times in Pinus, our results also indicate that node age estimates in pines depend on dating approaches and the specific fossil sets used, reflecting inherent differences in various dating approaches. The sets of dated phylogenetic trees of pines presented here provide a way to account for uncertainties in age estimations when applying comparative phylogenetic methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.