Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376717›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2017

Fossils matter: improved estimates of divergence times in Pinus reveal older diversification.

Bianca Saladin, Andrew B Leslie, Rafael O Wüest, Glenn Litsios, Elena Conti, Nicolas Salamin, Niklaus E Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Beetle bioluminescence outshines extant aerial predators.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Phylogenomic and ecological analyses reveal the spatiotemporal evolution of global pines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bianca SaladinSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland. bianca.saladin@wsl.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-6562
Andrew B LeslieDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Rafael O WüestSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Glenn LitsiosDepartment of Computational Biology, Biophore building, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Elena ContiDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany and Botanical Garden, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolas SalaminDepartment of Computational Biology, Biophore building, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Niklaus E ZimmermannSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe taxonomy of pines (genus Pinus) is widely accepted and a robust gene tree based on entire plastome sequences exists. However, there is a large discrepancy in estimated divergence times of major pine clades among existing studies, mainly due to differences in fossil placement and dating methods used. We currently lack a dated molecular phylogeny that makes use of the rich pine fossil record, and this study is the first to estimate the divergence dates of pines based on a large number of fossils (21) evenly distributed across all major clades, in combination with applying both node and tip dating methods.

resultsWe present a range of molecular phylogenetic trees of Pinus generated within a Bayesian framework. We find the origin of crown Pinus is likely up to 30 Myr older (Early Cretaceous) than inferred in most previous studies (Late Cretaceous) and propose generally older divergence times for major clades within Pinus than previously thought. Our age estimates vary significantly between the different dating approaches, but the results generally agree on older divergence times. We present a revised list of 21 fossils that are suitable to use in dating or comparative analyses of pines.

conclusionsReliable estimates of divergence times in pines are essential if we are to link diversification processes and functional adaptation of this genus to geological events or to changing climates. In addition to older divergence times in Pinus, our results also indicate that node age estimates in pines depend on dating approaches and the specific fossil sets used, reflecting inherent differences in various dating approaches. The sets of dated phylogenetic trees of pines presented here provide a way to account for uncertainties in age estimations when applying comparative phylogenetic methods.

Indexed as

FossilsGenetic SpeciationAnimalsBayes TheoremEvolution, MolecularPhylogenyPinusBayesian clock datingFossil calibrationFossilized birth-deathMolecular clock calibrationNode datingPhylogenyPines

Identifiers

PMID28376717
PMCPMC5381128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.