ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2017
Influence of Varying Training Set Composition and Size on Support Vector Machine-Based Prediction of Active Compounds.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning algorithms for identifying tuberculous pericardial effusion: insights from a retrospective study in Vietnam.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
- Remote Sensing of Nitric Acid and Temperature via Design of Experiments, Chemometrics, and Raman Spectroscopy.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Insights into Tetravalent Np Speciation in HNOACS omega · 2024Article
- Evaluating point-prediction uncertainties in neural networks for protein-ligand binding prediction.Artificial intelligence chemistry · 2023Article
- Toward Quantitative Models in Safety Assessment: A Case Study to Show Impact of Dose-Response Inference on hERG Inhibition Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- PPI-Affinity: A Web Tool for the Prediction and Optimization of Protein-Peptide and Protein-Protein Binding Affinity.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- Evolution of Support Vector Machine and Regression Modeling in Chemoinformatics and Drug Discovery.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Support vector machine (SVM) modeling is one of the most popular machine learning approaches in chemoinformatics and drug design. The influence of training set composition and size on predictions currently is an underinvestigated issue in SVM modeling. In this study, we have derived SVM classification and ranking models for a variety of compound activity classes under systematic variation of the number of positive and negative training examples. With increasing numbers of negative training compounds, SVM classification calculations became increasingly accurate and stable. However, this was only the case if a required threshold of positive training examples was also reached. In addition, consideration of class weights and optimization of cost factors substantially aided in balancing the calculations for increasing numbers of negative training examples. Taken together, the results of our analysis have practical implications for SVM learning and the prediction of active compounds. For all compound classes under study, top recall performance and independence of compound recall of training set composition was achieved when 250-500 active and 500-1000 randomly selected inactive training instances were used. However, as long as ∼50 known active compounds were available for training, increasing numbers of 500-1000 randomly selected negative training examples significantly improved model performance and gave very similar results for different training sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.