ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017
Breast Cancer Risk and Progressive Histology in Serial Benign Biopsies.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Machine Learning-Enhanced Proteomics to a Validated Diagnostic Model: A Pipeline for Breast Cancer Biomarker Discovery via Independent and Transcriptomic Corroboration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-Risk Breast Lesions on Core Biopsy: Rates of Upgrade and Management Recommendations.Surgical pathology clinics · 2025Review
- High-resolution microCT to assess breast microcalcification morphometry by histologic lesion subtype and radiologic classification.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Breast biopsies and breast cancer risk in Israeli BRCA germline pathogenic variant carriers.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- A hitchhiker's guide to cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for neuro-oncology.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Analysis of Lifestyle and Genetic Risk Factors in Urban Women in China Who Had Malignant or Suspected Malignant Breast Nodules Identified via Breast Cancer Screening.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Subsequent percutaneous breast biopsies after initial atypia diagnosis: The patient burden of long-term follow up.American journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Association of SNP rs5069 inGenes · 2022Article
- Associations of fecal microbial profiles with breast cancer and nonmalignant breast disease in the Ghana Breast Health Study.International journal of cancer · 2021Article
- Systematic analysis of breast atypical hyperplasia-associated hub genes and pathways based on text mining.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2019Article
- Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk in Women With Atypical Hyperplasia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Article
- Primed atypical ductal hyperplasia-associated fibroblasts promote cell growth and polarity changes of transformed epithelium-like breast cancer MCF-7 cells via miR-200b/c-IKKβ signaling.Cell death & disease · 2018Article
- Therapeutic Effects of a Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula Plus Tamoxifen vs. Tamoxifen for the Treatment of Mammary Gland Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: More than 1 million women per year in the United States with benign breast biopsies are known to be at elevated risk for breast cancer (BC), with risk stratified on histologic categories of epithelial proliferation. Here we assessed women who had serial benign biopsies over time and how changes in the histologic classification affected BC risk. Methods: In the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort of 13 466 women, 1414 women had multiple metachronous benign biopsies (10.5%). Both initial and subsequent biopsies were assessed histologically. BC risk for clinical and prognostic factors was assessed using subdistribution models to account for competing risks, and logistic regression/Wilcoxon/chi-square tests to assess covariates. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Breast cancer risk for women with serial biopsies, stratified by histologic category in the later biopsies, was similar to women with a single biopsy. We found that changes in histological category between initial and subsequent biopsy statistically significantly impacted BC risk. Women with nonproliferative initial findings and subsequent proliferative findings had an increased risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 2.94, P = .03) compared with no change. Among women with proliferative disease without atypia at initial biopsy, risk decreased if later biopsy regressed to nonproliferative (HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.98) and increased if later biopsy showed progression to atypical hyperplasia (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.73 to 3.05) compared with no change ( P = .04). Conclusions: We found that breast cancer risk increases in women with progressive epithelial proliferation over time and decreases in women whose biopsies show less proliferation. This finding has important implications for effective clinical management of the 100 000 women per year who have multiple benign breast biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.