ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017
The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Promoting rational antibiotic prescribing for non-complicated infections: understanding social influence in primary care networks in Germany.BMC family practice · 2020Trial
- Why evidence struggles to shape musculoskeletal health care and surgical practice in Australia: insights from an Australian clinician survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- General Practitioners' Perspectives on Digital Health Applications for Mental Disorders and Their Prescribing Behavior: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Trends in the Implementation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale: Bibliometric Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Peer effects on appropriate antibiotic prescribing within a patient-sharing physician network in China.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Physician Peer Influence on Salpingectomy Uptake for Tubal Sterilization and Ovarian Cancer Prevention.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Online Media Use and COVID-19 Vaccination in Real-World Personal Networks: Quantitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Effect of Health Service Area on Primary Care Physician Provision of Low-Value Cancer Screening.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Article
- Sustainability of a Clinical Decision Support Intervention for Outpatient Care for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Contextual factors influencing physicians' perception of antibiotic prescribing in primary care in Germany - a prospective observational study.BMC health services research · 2022Observational
- Article
- Health workers' social networks and their influence in the adoption of strategies to address the stillbirth burden at a subnational level health system in Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Review of social networks of professionals in healthcare settings-where are we and what else is needed?Globalization and health · 2021Review
- Physician trajectories of abandoning long-course breast radiotherapy and their cost impact.Health services research · 2021Article
- Surgeon and medical oncologist peer network effects on the uptake of the 21-gene breast cancer recurrence score assay.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- The growing amplification of social media: measuring temporal and social contagion dynamics for over 150 languages on Twitter for 2009-2020.EPJ data science · 2021Article
- Fostering Appropriate Antibiotic Use in a Complex Intervention: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation Alongside the Cluster-Randomized Trial ARena.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- The impact of sampling patients on measuring physician patient-sharing networks using Medicare data.Health services research · 2020Article
- Modeling peer effect modification by network strength: The diffusion of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the US hospital network.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans are widely used in breast cancer practice despite unproven benefits. We examined the extent to which social contagion is associated with adoption of these imaging modalities. Methods: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare to construct peer groups of physicians who shared patients during a baseline period when these imaging modalities were starting to disseminate into practice (2004-2006) and determined the potential impact of these peer groups during a follow-up period (2007-2009). For non-early-adopting surgeons (whose patients did not receive MRI/PET during baseline), we used hierarchical logistic regression models to examine the effect of their peer group's baseline use on their use of MRI/PET during the follow-up period, adjusting for patient characteristics and hospital MRI/PET use. Results: For MRI, there were 6424 women diagnosed in the follow-up period assigned to 986 non-early-adopting surgeons. During baseline, 9.3% of women received an MRI, varying across peer groups from 0% to 81%. Women assigned to surgeons whose peers had the highest rate of baseline MRI use were more likely to receive MRI compared with women whose surgeons' peers did not use MRI (24.9% vs 10.1%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.39 to 4.39). Physician peers were associated with uptake of PET imaging (OR for highest vs lowest baseline peer group PET use = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.24 to 3.36). Conclusions: The phenomenon of social contagion may offer opportunities to better understand how new approaches to cancer care disseminate into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.