Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376158›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017

Role of Antigen Spread and Distinctive Characteristics of Immunotherapy in Cancer Treatment.

James L Gulley, Ravi A Madan, Russell Pachynski, Peter Mulders, Nadeem A Sheikh, James Trager, Charles G Drake

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Randomized Phase II Trial of Sipuleucel-T with or without Radium-223 in Men with Bone-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cells · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Combined radiation andMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James L GulleyCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ravi A MadanCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Russell PachynskiWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Peter MuldersDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nadeem A SheikhDendreon Pharmaceuticals Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
James TragerDendreon Pharmaceuticals Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Charles G DrakeJohns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and The Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USCenter for Cancer Research · USRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Cancer Therapy Clinical Trials Using Novel Recombinant VaccinesZIABC010666 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2009 to 2025
$22.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy is an important breakthrough in cancer. US Food and Drug Administration-approved immunotherapies for cancer treatment (including, but not limited to, sipuleucel-T, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab) substantially improve overall survival across multiple malignancies. One mechanism of action of these treatments is to induce an immune response against antigen-bearing tumor cells; the resultant cell death releases secondary (nontargeted) tumor antigens. Secondary antigens prime subsequent immune responses (antigen spread). Immunotherapy-induced antigen spread has been shown in clinical studies. For example, in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, sipuleucel-T induced early immune responses to the immunizing antigen (PA2024) and/or the target antigen (prostatic acid phosphatase). Thereafter, most patients developed increased antibody responses to numerous secondary proteins, several of which are expressed in prostate cancer with functional relevance in cancer. The ipilimumab-induced antibody profile in melanoma patients shows that antigen spread also occurs with immune checkpoint blockade. In contrast to chemotherapy, immunotherapy often does not result in short-term changes in conventional disease progression end points (eg, progression-free survival, tumor size), which may be explained, in part, by the time taken for antigen spread to occur. Thus, immune-related response criteria need to be identified to better monitor the effectiveness of immunotherapy. As immunotherapy antitumor effects take time to evolve, immunotherapy in patients with less advanced cancer may have greater clinical benefit vs those with more advanced disease. This concept is supported by prostate cancer clinical studies with sipuleucel-T, PSA-TRICOM, and ipilimumab. We discuss antigen spread with cancer immunotherapy and its implications for clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAntigen PresentationAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralNeoplasmsTime FactorsAntigens, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID28376158
PMCPMC5441294
OpenAlexW2586368282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.