Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28376149›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017

Mammographic Density Change With Estrogen and Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk.

Celia Byrne, Giske Ursin, Christopher F Martin, Jennifer D Peck, Elodia B Cole, Donglin Zeng, Eunhee Kim, Martin D Yaffe, Norman F Boyd, Gerardo Heiss and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Estrogen Plus Progestin and Colorectal Cancer: Long-Term Findings From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Urinary Levels of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Breast Density in Young Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Celia ByrneUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Giske UrsinCancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population Based Cancer Research, Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway and Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Christopher F MartinUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer D PeckThe University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Elodia B ColeBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Donglin ZengUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Eunhee KimNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Martin D YaffeSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Norman F BoydOntario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gerardo HeissUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Anne McTiernanFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rowan T ChlebowskiLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Dorothy S LaneStony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
JoAnn E MansonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jean Wactawski-WendeUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Etta D PisanoBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Oslo · NOCancer Registry of Norway · NOUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Estrogen plus progestin therapy increases both mammographic density and breast cancer incidence. Whether mammographic density change associated with estrogen plus progestin initiation predicts breast cancer risk is unknown. Methods: We conducted an ancillary nested case-control study within the Women's Health Initiative trial that randomly assigned postmenopausal women to daily conjugated equine estrogen 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg or placebo. Mammographic density was assessed from mammograms taken prior to and one year after random assignment for 174 women who later developed breast cancer (cases) and 733 healthy women (controls). Logistic regression analyses included adjustment for confounders and baseline mammographic density when appropriate. Results: Among women in the estrogen plus progestin arm (97 cases/378 controls), each 1% positive change in percent mammographic density increased breast cancer risk 3% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01 to 1.06). For women in the highest quintile of mammographic density change (>19.3% increase), breast cancer risk increased 3.6-fold (95% CI = 1.52 to 8.56). The effect of estrogen plus progestin use on breast cancer risk (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.82) was eliminated in this study, after adjusting for change in mammographic density (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.51). Conclusions: We found the one-year change in mammographic density after estrogen plus progestin initiation predicted subsequent increase in breast cancer risk. All of the increased risk from estrogen plus progestin use was mediated through mammographic density change. Doctors should evaluate changes in mammographic density with women who initiate estrogen plus progestin therapy and discuss the breast cancer risk implications.

Indexed as

AgedBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedPostmenopauseEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Identifiers

PMID28376149
PMCPMC6059178
OpenAlexW2592511456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.